Andersen, K. and Miller, E.D. (1997). Gender and student evaluations of teaching; Political Science  Politics, 30 (2): 216-219.

Basow, S.A. and Silberg, N.T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of  Educational Psycholog, 79 (3): 308-314.

Bellamy, L.D. and  Evans, D. and Linder, B. and McNeill. G & Raupp.A .(1999). Active learning, team and quality management principles in the engineering classroom. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education.Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.

Brent, R., Felder, R.M. (2008). Writing assignments Pathways to connections, clarity, creativity; College Teaching, 2 (2): 43-47.

Bloom, B.S. (2010). Taxonomy of educational objectives1:Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.

Burns-Glover, A.L. and Veith, D.J. (1995). Revisiting gender and teaching evaluation. Sex still makes a different. Journal of Social Behanior & Personality, 10 (6): 69-80.

Campbell.W.E. and Smith, K.A. (2009). New paradigms for college teaching. Edina, Minn.: Interaction Book Company.

Centra, J.A. and Gaubatz, N.B. (2000). Is there gender bias in student evaluation of teaching? Journal of Higher Education, 71(1): 17-33.

Deming, W.E .(2004). The new economics. 2d ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Studies.

Diller, K. R. and Barnes, J. W. (2000). Adaptation of total quality methods to the administration of an academic engineering department; Journal of  Engineering Education, 3(1): 249-253.

Ganjy, M., Zahed babolan, A. and Moienikia, M. (2012). A meta-analysis of research on the role of teaching patterns on students' academic achievement; Journal of School Psychology; 1(1): 93- 107. (in Persian).

Goodwin, L.D. and Stevens, E.A. (1993). The influence of gender on university faculty’ members’ perceptions of “good” teaching;  Journal of Higher Education, 64 (2): 166-185.

Gronlund .N. E .(2000). How to write and use instructional objectives. 4th ed. New York: Macmillan.

Grasha, A.F. (1994). A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model,facilitator, and delegator. College Teaching, 42 (4): 142-149.

Houshmand, A.A. C. N., Papadakis, J.F.,  McDonough, T.W. and Fowler, G. and Markle, S. (2004). Methodology for improving quality of instruction; Journal of Engineering Education, 2(3):117-122.

Jensen, P.A. and Robinson, J.K. (2001). Deming’s quality principles applied to a large lecture course; Journal of Engineering Education, 1(5): 45-50.

Johnson .D. W & Johnson.R.T & Smith.K.A .(1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. 2d ed. Edina,Minn.: Interaction Press.

Joseph.C .(2014). Women More Educated Than Men But Still Paid Less. Yale ;Global, 6 March 2014A Publication of the MacMillan Center.

 Karapetrovic.S & Rajamani.D .(2002). An approach to the application of statistical quality control techniques in engineering courses; Journal of Engineering Education; 3(1): 269–276.

Kenneth.K .(2013). Salary differences: Why do women earn less than men? http://www.alumniportal-deutschland.org.

Kardia, D.B. & Wright. M.C .(2004). Instructor identity: The impact of gender and race on faculty experiences with teaching. Occasional Paper. University of Michican Center for Research on Learning and Teaching.

Kuh, G. D & Nelson. L.T. F & Umbach.P. D .(2004). Aligning faculty and student behavior:Realizing the promise of Greater Expectations; Liberal Education; 90 (4): 24-31.

Lacey.C.H & Saleh.A & Gorman.R .(1998). Teaching nine to five: A study of the teaching styles of male and female professors. Paper presented at the Annual Women in Education Conference, Lincoln, Nebraska, October 11-12.

Latzko .W.J .(2011). Modeling the method: The Deming classroom.Quality Management Journal; 5(1): 46–55.

Lisa.V & Raymond. B. (2001). Teaching in the medical setting: balancing teaching style , learning styles and teachingmethods; Journal of Medical Teacher; 23(1): 610-612.

Litwhiler.D.W & Kiemele.M.J .(2000). TQM and DOE in an undergraduate curriculum: Success stories; Journal of Engineering Education; 2(1): 147–151.

McKeachie, W. (1999). Teaching tips. 10th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

National Survey of Student Engagement .(2005). Exploring different dimensions of student engagement. Bloomington; IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

Singer.E .(1996). Espoused teaching paradigms of college faculty; Research in Higher Education; 37(6): 659-679.

Shelnutt .J.W & Buch.K .(1999). Using total quality principles for strategic planning and curriculum revision; Journal of Engineering Education; 3(1): 201–207.

Shuman. L.J., Atman, C.J. and  Wolfe.H .(1999). Applying TQM in the IE classroom: The switch to active learning. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.

Summers.D. C. S .(1998). TQM education: Parallels between industry and education. Proceedings of the 1998 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education. Washington,D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.

Starbuck.G.H .(2003). College teaching styles by gender. Paper presented at the Western Social

Science Association Annual Meeting; Las Vegas, NV, April 9-12.

Statham.A & Richardson.L & Cook.J.A .(2007).Gender and university teaching: A negotiated difference. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Tartro.C.N. (1995). Gender effects on student evaluation of faculty; Journal of Research and Development in Education;  28(3): 169-173.

Welch, K. (2004). Sex Differences in Language and the Importance of Context: An Observational Study of Classroom Speech;  Yale University, undergraduate thesis.

Whitworth, J.E., Price, B.A. and  Randall, C.H. (2002). Factors that affect business college students opinion of teaching and learning;  Journal of Business Education, 2(3): 282-289.