data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12368/12368c57a9275f81d5fb4177f1912178ebc2e0a9" alt="سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه کردستان"
تعداد نشریات | 31 |
تعداد شمارهها | 334 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,274 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,073,542 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,879,362 |
بهرهگیری از راهبردهای تکیهگاه سازی آموزشی و تعیین میزان اثربخشی آن بر یادگیری و انگیزه پیشرفت دانشآموزان با اختلال یادگیری ریاضی پایه پنجم ابتدایی | ||
تدریس پژوهی | ||
مقاله 10، دوره 8، شماره 1، فروردین 1399، صفحه 217-198 اصل مقاله (878.66 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.34785/J012.2020.927 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
محبوبه عارفی* 1؛ ثریا خزایی2؛ آذر خزایی3 | ||
1دانشیار دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
2دانشجوی دکتری فناوری اطلاعرسانی در آموزش عالی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی و آموزگار ابتدایی شهرستان پردیس (تهران) ، تهران، ایران | ||
3دانشجوی دکتری تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی و آموزگار ابتدایی شهرستان نورآباد (لرستان) ، تهران، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی بهرهگیری از راهبردهای تکیهگاهسازی آموزشی و تعیین میزان اثربخشی آن بر یادگیری و انگیزه پیشرفت دانشآموزان با اختلال یادگیری ریاضی بود. روش: دراین پژوهش از روش نیمه آزمایشی و از نوع پیشآزمون و پسآزمون با گروه کنترل استفاده شد. جامعه آماری شامل همه دانشآموزان پسر پایه پنجم دبستان با اختلال ریاضی در مراکز اختلال یادگیری خرمآباد در سال تحصیلی 96-97 بودند. بدین منظور از میان کلیه دانشآموزان مراکز اختلال یادگیری خرمآباد، 22 دانشآموز بهصورت در دسترس انتخاب و بهصورت تصادفی در دو گروه کنترل و آزمایش (11 نفر برای هر گروه) گمارده شدند. بهمنظور جمعآوری دادهها از آزمون محقق ساخته یادگیری و پرسشنامه انگیزه پیشرفت هرمنس (1970) استفاده شد. در فرایند اجرا، گروه آزمایش به مدت 8 جلسه چهلوپنج دقیقهای تحت طرح درس مبتنی بر راهبردهای تکیهگاهسازی آموزش دیدند و گروه کنترل هیچ مداخلهای را دریافت نکرد. دادههای جمعآوریشده با نرمافزار SPSS-V22 و تحلیل کوواریانس تجزیهوتحلیل شد. یافتهها: نتایج تحلیل کوواریانس نشان داد که طرح درس مبتنی بر راهبردهای تکیهگاهسازی آموزشی بر یادگیری و انگیزه پیشرفت مؤثر است، به این صورت که منجر به افزایش یادگیری و انگیزه پیشرفت دانشآموزان دارای اختلال یادگیری ریاضی شده است | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
اختلال ریاضی؛ اثربخشی؛ انگیزه پیشرفت؛ تکیهگاه سازی آموزشی | ||
مراجع | ||
Ahmadi Safa, M., & Rozati, F. (2017). The impact of scaffolding and nonscaffolding strategies on the EFL learners' listening comprehension development. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 447-456. Alwahibee, K. M. (2019). The Impact of Scaffolding Techniques on Saudi English-Language Learners’ Speaking Abilities. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(5). Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 45-72. Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: Introduction and review. ZDM, 47(7), 1047-1065. Bean, T. W., & Stevens, L. P. (2002). Scaffolding reflection for preservice and inservice teachers. Reflective Practice, 3(2), 205-218. Behrad, B. (2006). Solving the prevalence of learning disabilities in primary school students in Iran. Research on Exceptional Children, 18, No. 4,417-436, (Persian). Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2008). A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 401-422. Biabangard, E. (2014). Educational Psychology (Psychology of Education and Learning). Publications: Edit, (Persian). Brownfield, K., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2018). Examining the impact of scaffolding on literacy learning: A critical examination of research and guidelines to advance inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 177-190. Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, S. F. (2001). Learning through computer‐based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of computer assisted learning, 17(1), 21-33. Chiang, C. S., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL quarterly, 26(2), 345-374. Clark, R. C., & Lyons, C. (2010). Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials. John Wiley & Sons. Cox, W. R. (2018). The Impact of Scaffolding on the Historical Thinking Skills of Middle School Students. Dagoc, D., & Tan, D. A. (2018). Effects of Metacognitive Scaffolding on the Mathematics Performance of Grade 6 Pupils in a Cooperative Learning Environment. International Journal of English and Education, 7(4), 378-391. Ebrahimi, M., Alizadeh, H., Ghobari ,B., Baqer, Dastjerdi Kazemi, M., & Bakhtiari, A. (2020). Over-analysis of research based on the model of response to intervention on improving students' academic performance at the risk of mathematical disorder. Learning Disabilities, 10 (1), 7-31. doi: 10.22098 / jld.2020.919 Eslinger, E., White, B., Frederiksen, J., & Brobst, J. (2008). Supporting inquiry processes with an interactive learning environment: Inquiry Island. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 610-617. Goh, C. C. (2017). Research into practice: Scaffolding learning processes to improve speaking performance. Language Teaching, 50(2), 247-260. Hooman, H., & Asgari, A. (1997). preparation and standardization of the motivation test for progress. Journal: Psychological research, 11.(Persian) Khani, A., & Khaledian, M. (2009). Teaching students learning strategies with the inability to learn intelligently. Exceptional Education Monthly, (95-96), 23-31, (Persian). Lajoie, S. P., Guerrera, C., Munsie, S. D., & Lavigne, N. C. (2001). Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld. Instructional Science, 29(2), 155-186. Lantolf, J.(2001). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Language Learning (pp. 23-26). New York: Oxford University Press. Lu, J., Lajoie, S. P., & Wiseman, J. (2010). Scaffolding problem-based learning with CSCL tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 283-298. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 85-139). Academic Pres. McCloskey, M.L., Stack, L. Orr, J. K., & Kleckova, G. (2010). Scaffolding Academic Language for English Learners: What, Why, How? Washington, DC: US Department of State.40-41. Meskill, C. (2005). Triadic scaffolds: Tools for teaching English language learners with computers. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 46-59. Mosaic, A., Valinejad, W., & Shirkrami, F. (2015). Investigating the prevalence of learning disabilities in elementary school students, first National Conference on Islamic Humanities, (Persian). Narimani, M., Rajabi, S., Afrooz, G, A., & Samadi, H. (2011). A study of the effectiveness of learning disabilities centers in Ardabil province in improving the symptoms of students' learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 1 (1),129 -128, (Persian). Nguyen, M. (2013). EFL students’ reflections on peer scaffolding in making a collaborative oral presentation. English Language Teaching, 6, 105–115. Park, S., & Lim, J. (2007). Promoting positive emotion in multimedia learning using visual illustrations. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(2), 141-162. Pata, K., Lehtinen, E., & Sarapuu, T. (2006). Inter-relations of tutor’s and peers’ scaffolding and decision-making discourse acts. Instructional Science, 34(4), 313-341. Peterson, T. (2019). Learning Disabilities Statistics and Prevalence, Healthy Place. Retrieved on 2020, June 4 from https://www.healthyplace.com /parenting/learning-disabilities/learning-disabilities-statistics-and-prevalence. Pourjamshidi, M., Zanganeh, H., & Momenirad, A. (2014). Instructional Scaffolding and its Impact on Learning Persian Language Rahimi Doust, H., Nowruz, D., Fardanesh, H., & Amir Teymouri, M. (2012). Computer-based learning support framework for solving computer-based problems. Journal of Educational Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz. No. 1. Pages 243-268, (Persian). Sadock, B. J., & Sadock, V. A. (2011). Kaplan and Sadock's synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Saif, N., Ezatullah, M., & Ezatullah, N. (2011). Special learning disabilities. Tehran: Arasbaran Publications, (Persian). Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. (2011). The process of problem‐based learning: what works and why. Medical education, 45(8), 792-806. Silver, C. H., Ruff, R. M., Iverson, G. L., Barth, J. T., Broshek, D. K., Bush, S. S., & Planning Committee. (2008). Learning disabilities: The need for neuropsychological evaluation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(2), 217-219. Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional science, 35(1), 41-72. Smith, W., Butcher, E., Litvin, S. W., & Frash, R. (2015). Incorporating an instructional scaffolding approach into the classroom: Teaching for authentic learning in hospitality and tourism education. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 15(3), 264-277. Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008). Distributed cognition in a sixth-grade classroom: An attempt to overcome alternative conceptions about light and color. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(3), 309-336. Van de Pol, J. Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6. Vonna, Y., Mukminatien, N., & Laksmi, E. D. (2015). The effect of scaffolding techniques on students’ writing achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 3(3), 227-233. Wallace, G., McLaughlin, J., Manshiatusi, M., Lotfabadi, H., & Kamiabi, J. (1997). Learning disabilities concepts and features. Astan Quds Razavi, Cultural Deputy Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). 'The role of tutoring in problem solving,' J. Child Psychol. Psychiat., 17, 89-100. Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2008). How to optimize learning from animated models: A review of guidelines based on cognitive load. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 645-675. Wu, H. L. (2011). Scaffolding in technology-enhanced science education (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A & M University). Zorofi, M. (2010). The Study of Students’ Mathematics Lesson Learning Quality. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 505-511 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 843 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 979 |