Allah eshtehardian, E., & Fa’ezi rad, M. A. (2015). Using Artificial Neural Network for float pricing of Tehran traffic tolls to improve urban management focused on decreasing air pollution, Modiriat Shahri, 13(36), 154-145. [in Persian]
Asgari, A., Moini, S. M., & Goli, A. (2013). The assessment of proposed traffic control zone of the city of Shiraz from citizen' viewpoint. Modiriat Shahri, 10(29), 165-178. [in Persian]
Ardıç, Ö., Annema, J. A., & van Wee, B. (2013). Has the Dutch news media acted as a policy actor in the road pricing policy debate? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 57, 47-63.
Azari, K. A., Arintono, S., Hamid, H., & Davoodi, S. R. (2013). Evaluation of demand for different trip purposes under various congestion pricing scenarios. Journal of Transport Geography, 29, 43-51.
Berglund, C., & Matti, S. (2006). Citizen and consumer: the dual role of individuals in environmental policy. Environmental politics, 15(4), 550-571.
Börjesson, M., Eliasson, J., Hugosson, M. B., & Brundell-Freij, K. (2012). The Stockholm congestion charges—5 years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt. Transport Policy, 20, 1-12.
Eliasson, J., & Jonsson, L. (2011). The unexpected “yes”: Explanatory factors behind the positive attitudes to congestion charges in Stockholm. Transport Policy, 18(4), 636-647.
Emmerink, R., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (1995). Is congestion pricing a first-best strategy in transport policy? A critical review of arguments. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22(5), 581-602.
Farrell, S., & Saleh, W. (2005). Road-user charging and the modelling of revenue allocation. Transport Policy, 12(5), 431-442.
Fielding, N. G., & Lee, R. M. (1998). Computer analysis and qualitative research. Sage.
Firooz Zare, A., & Ghorbani, M. (2012). Investigation of citizens' WTP for Mashhad air pollution reduction (applying two stage Heckman model). Modiriat Shahri, 28(9), 7-26. [in Persian]
Mashinchi Abbasi, P., & Arabi, M. (2019). Modeling people trips mode choice for entry into the central metropolis Tehran congestion charging zone. Modiriat Shahri,17(52), 65-80. [in Persian]
The History of Tehran traffic congestion scheme (2005). Jostarhae Shahrsazi, 9(1), 8-11. [in Persian]
Fujii, S., Gärling, T., Jakobsson, C., & Jou, R.-C. (2004). A cross-country study of fairness and infringement on freedom as determinants of car owners' acceptance of road pricing. Transportation, 31(3), 285-295.
Gaunt, M., Rye, T., & Allen, S. (2007). Public acceptability of road user charging: the case of Edinburgh and the 2005 referendum. Transport Reviews, 27(1), 85-102.
Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage publications.
Glavic, D., Mladenovic, M., Luttinen, T., Cicevic, S., & Trifunovic, A. (2017). Road to price: User perspectives on road pricing in transition country. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 105, 79-94.
Grisolía, J. M., López, F., & de Dios Ortúzar, J. (2015). Increasing the acceptability of a congestion charging scheme. Transport Policy, 39, 37-47.
Gu, Z., Liu, Z., Cheng, Q., & Saberi, M. (2018). Congestion pricing practices and public acceptance: A review of evidence. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(1), 94-101.
Huber, R. A., Wicki, M. L., & Bernauer, T. (2020). Public support for environmental policy depends on beliefs concerning effectiveness, intrusiveness, and fairness. Environmental politics, 29(4), 649-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1629171
Ison, S., & Rye, T. (2005). Implementing road user charging: the lessons learnt from Hong Kong, Cambridge and Central London. Transport Reviews, 25(4), 451-465.
Ittner, H., Becker, R., & Kals, E. (2003). WILLINGNESS TO SUPPORT TRAFFIC POLICY MEASURES: THE ROLE OF JUSTICE. IN: ACCEPTABILITY OF TRANSPORT PRICING STRATEGIES. MC-ICAM Conference, Acceptability of Transport Pricing StrategiesCommission of the European Communities,
Jaensirisak, S., Wardman, M., & May, A. (2005). Explaining variations in public acceptability of road pricing schemes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 39(2), 127-154.
Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., & Gärling, T. (2000). Determinants of private car users' acceptance of road pricing. Transport Policy, 7(2), 153-158.
Kim, I., & Kuljis, J. (2010). Applying content analysis to web-based content. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 18(4), 369-375.
Kim, J., Schmöcker, J.-D., Fujii, S., & Noland, R. B. (2013). Attitudes towards road pricing and environmental taxation among US and UK students. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 50-62.
Lindberg, G. (1995). Road pricing: policy and options for the future. In Road pricing: Theory, empirical assessment and policy (pp. 205-221). Springer.
Ryley, T., & Gjersoe, N. (2006). Newspaper response to the Edinburgh congestion charging proposals. Transport Policy, 13(1), 66-73.
Schade, J., & Schlag, B. (2000). Acceptability of urban transport pricing. Valtion Taloudellinen Tutkimuskeskus Helsinki, Finland.
Schade, J., & Schlag, B. (2003). Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6(1), 45-61.
Schaller, B. (2010). New York City’s congestion pricing experience and implications for road pricing acceptance in the United States. Transport Policy, 17(4), 266-273.
Schmöcker, J.-D., Pettersson, P., & Fujii, S. (2012). Comparative analysis of proximal and distal determinants for the acceptance of coercive charging policies in the UK and Japan. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 6(3), 156-173.
Schuitema, G., Steg, L., & Rothengatter, J. A. (2010). The acceptability, personal outcome expectations, and expected effects of transport pricing policies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 587-593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.002
Sugiarto, S., Miwa, T., & Morikawa, T. (2020). The tendency of public’s attitudes to evaluate urban congestion charging policy in Asian megacity perspective: Case a study in Jakarta, Indonesia. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(1), 143-152.
Teubel, U. (2000). The welfare effects and distributional impacts of road user charges on commuters-an empirical analysis of Dresden. International Journal of Transport Economics/Rivista internazionale di economia dei trasporti, 231-255.
Ubbels, B., & Verhoef, E. T. (2005). Acceptability of road pricing and revenue use in the Netherlands 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Land Use and Water Management in a Sustainable Network Society", Amsterdam, The Netherlands. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/117444
Weare, C., & Lin, W.-Y. (2000). Content analysis of the World Wide Web: Opportunities and challenges. Social science computer review, 18(3), 272-292.
http://traffic.tehran.ir/.
