پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 291 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,840 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,324,267 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,389,428 |
The design & validation of the Model of professional Ethics of primary Schools principals A mixed Method Study | ||
| School Administration | ||
| مقاله 19، دوره 9، شماره 2، شهریور 2021، صفحه 517-538 اصل مقاله (934.19 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Mixed Method Research Paper | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Nazanin Zadeh Moradian alani1؛ Ebrahim Pourhosseini* 2؛ Shoja Araban3 | ||
| 1PhD Student in Educational Management, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai Campus, Lorestan Farhangian University, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The professional Ethic is a collection of principles and standards of human behavior, which specifies individuals and Groups treatment. Josephson (2013) believed that human attend to professional Ethic is because of its impact on civil society stability. In the Qualitative section, data is collected by Doulfy Technic, which has done in 3 steps Through semi structural interviews. The 3 steps of this Model is: open coding, Axial, and Random. In this research, we’ve used 4 external audit procedure, and the results has obtained Through Participates, in addition versatile and Longitude involvement. In the Quantitative section, it is used scaling / descriptive Method. The statistical society included of Persons of Lorestan province primary school as Managers. So that, at the beginning, we separated 25 districts from each other, Then, The relative category was done. The sampling method on Quantitative section was scaling random, according to districts’ volume. To evaluate the sample volume, at first, was done pre-sampling of statistical society, as 30 persons, as well for criterion deviation of this pre-sample (0.503). Despite, the volume (2366) and replacing random sampling of cook ran, determined that the sample volume was Just 330 persons. The recent study responses 3 below Questions: How s the primary school Managers professional ethical Model? Does this Model have a narrative explanation? Does it have a stability process? This study has a main target of applied probation. This research has done as a purview process. The Method of this study is done according to Qualitative /Quontratative method to collect information, also, it is the kind of consecutive exploratory as tool making, which the researchers has paid to identity school managers professional ctice components in Qualitative section, and following, to study Quantitative data of statistical society the research strategy, in the first section was based on content analysis. As included of 16 persons of Educational / scientific Tenures of university and experts, whom were elected as purposive sampling Method. At the end, results showed that there were 81 open codes, 9 subsidiary, and 3 Main components. The Main components are: personal features, Job property, Emotional traits, Ethic strategies, professional abilities, Duty factors, social, cultural factors, and 81 Locution, based on degree 5 Liker spectrum. The data analysis Method in the first part was codding Method, and in the Latter section was structural Equation Modeling style. The applied Lisrel App showed that Main components of professional ethic Included 3 personal, intra, and external organizational dimensions, besides 9 subsidiary components including of personal features, Job property, Emotional Traits, Leadership & management, Ethic strategies, professional abilities, Duty factors, social, cultural variables, and 81 open codes. The analysis results showed the confirmatory variables, and cronbach’s Alfa coefficient was as a narrative process, which confirmed the stability of this Model. The personal, Job, and Emotional properties are 3 subset of personal dimension. Also, Ethic Leadership strategy, professional abilities, Duty factors are 3 subset of interior organizational component. But, Duty, Social, and cultural factors are 3 subset of exterior organizational component. Results showed that primary school Management professional Ethic interior organizational Level is more important. So, according to the importance of this area, the Managers should have a proper Ethic behavior own. They are bonded to regard to prioritize Ethic values, Leading behaviors, and Ethic duty ascertaining, in order to create Ethical strategies. In the interior organization area, professional Ethic is based on doing duty and having a high responsibility, Means being responsible against Group’s goal, in order to reinforcement and discover predisposition of individuals, to development of Educational organization. In the other hand, professional Ethic of exterior organization Is used to be the scale of being Justice, which in the most effective element in achievements of every organization. To specify these finding, it is deducted that all organizations have a set of interior and exterior elements as an effective continuos and ongoing component, that in fact, is the organization impotence operation. Namely, exterior factors of professional Ethic belongs to Ethical behavior feedbacks through outside resources. Economic, social, cultural, and political components, and also other organization elements, specially the competitive ones are the most effective variables on organization. These variable have an important role on Management process to make social responsibility, as providers control, designing, and performance, making relationship with exterior Variables of audit, and confirmation affairs according to professional Ethic exterior organization occasions. In the third dimension of professional Ethics, there is personal dimension, which includes of series of accepted believes of goodness, wrongs, admiration or obscene behavior that draws the Ethic trajectory in her/his Job. In the personal dimension, both personal and Job properties results to gradation “professional Ethic position among managers. In order to specify the total research Model, one could say: professional Ethic is considered upon 3 levels. In the personal area, Ethic is a complex component, which is regretful of values and social believes. But, Ethic norms form in families, at first, and then, in school, as a interal personality phenomenon. In the organizational dimension, has a vital role on forming Ethical norms. Therefore, it is remarkable to design and management of Educational system, according to suggested Model as combinatorial of above important variable.” Although, there is on increasing emphasis on professional Ethic, research necessity. But, The researchers should read More about These topics. In some society like our country, The professional Ethic has benn created in schools or universities. (Gharamaleki, 2017). The Education, is one of the most effective social institutions activity depend on Modality of Education activity. In the other hand, the Managers are hand led with a lats of students, whom gait into schools, for the first time, and the education systems have an effective impact their views and believs, for ever, specially on their life. From the other side, teachers demand Justice, honesty, and Moral behavior in their workhouses. They tend to observe these properties from management and undertakings, in order to feel more assurance to follow their duties. So, according to this research, designing and validatory of professional ethic for primary school managements of lorestan province education is a vital affair. Moreover, regarding these doctrine may change the students’ Life course. We hope these goals be realized. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Professional Ethic Model؛ Managers؛ Design؛ Validation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Biegzade, J., Sadeghi, M., & Ebrahimpour, D. (2013). The Impact of Organizational Factors on the Growth of Employees' Professional Ethics, Ethics in Science and Technology, 7 (2), 55-63. Cadozier, V. (2002). The moral profession: A study of moral development and professional ethics of Faculty. Texas: university of Texas. 2(9), 55-72. Dabbagh, S. (2010). Ethics of Organizational Happiness Alchemy, Tadbir Monthly, No. 185, 6-14. Dabiri, A., & Mirjalili, S K. (2019).The nature of moral theory; An Explanation of a True and Acceptable Ethical Theory, Ethics Research Journal, 11 (41), 7-20. Daudisa, T., & Vevere, V. (2020). Importance of professional ethics and corporate social responsibility within business studies curriculum within context global economy. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 74, p. 04004). EDP Sciences. Esfandiari Moghaddam, A. (2014). Professional ethics of librarians and informants, Qom, third edition, librarian publication. Farhoud, D. (2012). Ethics Education, Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 6 (3), 1-5. Ghanbari, S., Ardalan, M R., Beheshtirad, R., & Sultanzadeh, V. (2016). Professional ethics of faculty members and its relationship with the quality of higher education, Ethics in Science and Technology, 10 (2), 40-50. Ghanbarpour, O., Abbasian, H., Arasteh, H R., & Nave Ibrahim, A. (2019). Designing a Teacher Professional Ethics Model: A Mixed Study, Educational Innovations, 18 (1), 60-33. Gharamaleki, A. (2017). Organizational Ethics, Tehran, Second Edition, Published by Industrial Management Organization. Harness, J. (2018). Types of Professional Ethics Human Resources. Online University, Bachelor, Master and Doctorate degree programs for working adults. Hassanpour, A., Nazari, K., & Akbari, P. (2019). Designing a Model of Factors Affecting the Professional Ethics of Teaching in Payame Noor University of the West, Sociology of Education, 3 (6), 87-101. Holmes, R. (2003). Fundamentals of Philosophy of Ethics, translated by Massoud Olya. (2013). Tehran, second edition, Phoenix Publishing. Hosseinian, S. (2019). Ethics in Counseling and Psychology (Principles and Principles), Tehran, 8th edition, Kamal Publishing. Khan, B. H., & Smith, H. L. (2007). Student evaluation instrument for online programs. Flexible learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. 4(6), 112-130. Militello M., Fusarelli B., Alsbury T., & Warren P. (2013). How professional standards guide practice for school principals. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(1), 74-90. Murphy, J. F. (2016). Professional standards for educational leaders: The empirical, moral, and experiential foundations. Corwin Press. Ng S. W., & Chan T. M. K. (2014). Continuing professional development for middle leaders in primary schools in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Administration. 25(6), 869-889. Rahman Sarsht, H., Rafiei, M., & Koosha, M. (2011). Social responsibility; Extra-organizational ethics, Tadbir Monthly, 19 (204), 100-110. Rahmodel, H., Samanian, M., & Kafashpour, A. (2020). Explaining and Presenting the Native Model of Professional Ethics (Case Study: Banking Industry Managers), Journal of Bioethics, 9 (32), 7-18. Rezaian, A. (2012). Fundamentals of Organization and Management, 16th Edition, Tehran: Samat. Salimi, M (2017). Presenting a model for the development of professional ethics in sports organizations, Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 12 (1), 1-13. Shirmohammadi, M., & Asgharizadeh, E. (2011). Pathology of professional ethics in consulting companies (organizational architecture), ethics in science and technology, 5 (1-2), 83-74. Tirri, K. (2010). Teachers’ values underlying their professional ethics. In T. Lovat et al. (Eds) International Handbook on Values Education and Student Well-Being (pp. 153- 163). New York: Springer. Yazdanesta, F., & Asadi, F. (2017). Development and validation of a staff ethics questionnaire, Quarterly Journal of Educational Management Research, 8 (1), 17-30. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 874 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 132 |
||