
تعداد نشریات | 31 |
تعداد شمارهها | 357 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,464 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,390,605 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,069,822 |
طراحی و اعتبارسنجی برنامه درسی رشته کارشناسی ارشد فن آوری اطلاعات در آموزش از دیدگاه صاحبنظران | ||
مدیریت دانشگاهی | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 1، شماره 3، آذر 1401، صفحه 129-101 اصل مقاله (483 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jam.2022.62530 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
محمد رحمانپور1؛ ریبوار نادری* 2؛ جواد حاتمی3 | ||
1دکتری مطالعات برنامه درسی، مدرس گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد مریوان، دانشگاه پیام نور، مریوان، ایران. | ||
2کارشناس ارشد آموزش بزرگسالان،گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
3استاد برنامه ریزی درسی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف از انجام این پژوهش، طراحی و اعتبارسنجی برنامه درسی رشته کارشناسی ارشد فنآوری اطلاعات در آموزش از دیدگاه صاحبنظران بود. این پژوهش از نوع کیفی بود که با استفاده از روش زمینهیابی انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری پژوهش، اساتید شاغل در دانشگاههای اصفهان، صنعتی شریف، کردستان، علامه طباطبایی و تربیت مدرس بود که با 15 از آنان مصاحبه به عمل آمد. مصاحبه به صورت نیمه ساختار یافته انجام گرفت که روایی محتوایی سوالات از قبل مورد تایید چند نفر صاحبنظر در حوزه قرار گرفت. بعد از جمعآوری اطلاعات موردنظر، با از روش مقولهبندی مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که در بخش اهداف برنامه درسی رشته فنآوری اطلاعات در آموزش تاکید اصلی بر ایجاد مهارتهای کاربردی و ظرفیت کارآفرینی دانشجویان بود. در بخش محتوا، تلفیق واحدهای نظری و عملی و اولویت داشتن جنبه کاربردی و همچنین نوآوری در محتوا از مقولههای مهم بود. در بخش راهبردهای یاددهی- یادگیری و روشهای ارزشیابی، مصاحبهشوندگان تنوع در روشها و همچنین روشهای عملی و آزمایشگاهی را در کنار روشهای پروژهای پیشنهاد دادند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
فن آوری اطلاعات؛ آموزش؛ طراحی؛ اعتبارسنجی؛ صاحبنظران | ||
مراجع | ||
Aesaret, K., Vanderlinde, R., Tondeur, J., & Braak, J. V. (2013). The content of educational technology curricula: a cross-curricular state of the art, Education Tech Research Dev, (61):131–151. Aliabadi, Kh. (2012). Review of educational curriculum: Branch of instructional technology, Quarterly Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(26), 45-68, [in Persian]. Barghi, I., Maleki, H., Abbaspur, A., Zareii Zavaraki, E., & Seraji, F. (2014). Designing and Validation of Favorable Problem-Based Curriculum Pattern in E-Learning Universities; A Combinational Study Bimonthly of Education Strategies inMedical Sciences, 7(1), 63-68. Barkhordari, S. (2017). I nvestigating the impact of audit, evaluation and validation on improving the quality of the higher education system (case study: faculty members of Gilan University). Management and accounting studies quarterly, 2, 3, 270-284. Biemans, H., Wesselink, R., Gulikers, J., Schaafsma, S., Verstegen, J. & Mulder, M. (2010). TowardsCompetence-Based VET: Dealing with the Pitfalls. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 61(3), 267-286. Fathi-Azar, F. A., R. Badri-Gargari, R., & Ghahreman-Zadeh, K. F. (2012). Assessing the quality of educational technology curriculum. Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 1(1), 9- 31. [In Persian]. Fathi-vajargah, koroh. (2008). Urriculum: Towards New Identities, Tehran: Aizh Publications. [In Pearsian]. Hamdani, M. (2021) Research in English Language Pedagogy (RELP); Isfahan. 9, Special: 175-187. DOI:10.30486/relp.2021.1932481.1286. Keshtiarai, N., Vajargah, K., Zimitat, C., & Foroughi, A, A. (2009). Designing an experienced curriculum model based on phenomenology and Its validation in medical Groups. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 1, 55-67. [In Pearsian]. Harpaz, I., Balik, C., & Ehrenfeld, M. (2006). Concept Mapping: An educational strategy for advancing nursing education. Nursing Forum, 39 (2), 27-30. Hewitt, T. W. (2006). Understanding and shaping curriculum: What we teach and why. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Khosravi, F., Jafari, A., & Mirshah- Jafari, S. E. (2010). Survey of quo & desired status of Educational Technology in viewpoint of country faculty, 9th Annual Seminar of Curriculum Studies Association”, Tabriz-Iran, [in Persian]. Longino, J. M. (2008). Evaluation of implementation of technology. International Research Journal, 1(12), 7240-7248. Jafari, S., Talebinejad, M.R., & Ketabi, S. (2021). Comparative Effects of Technology-, Motivational- and Metacognitive-based Scaffolding on Male and Female Iranian Adult Advanced EFL Learners’ Speaking.Research in English Language Pedagogy.9. 259-282. [in Persian]. Khalkhali, A., Shakibaei, Z., & Andesh, M. (2011). Meta-Analysis on the Impact of ICT on Teachers' Professional Development. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences. 1(3), 165-183.[in Persian]. Kleimola, R., & Leppisaari, I. (2022). Learning Analytics To Develop Future Competences in Higher Education: a case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 17. McDonald, J., & Gibbons, A. S. (2009). Technology I, II, and III: criteria understanding and improving the practice of instructional technology, Education Tech Research Development, 57, 377-392. McDaniel, E, A., Roth, B. F., & Miller, M.S. (2009). Concept Mapping as a Tool Curriculum Design, Issues in information science and Information Design, Publisher@Informing Science.org. Mulder, M. (2015). Conceptions of Professional Competence. In: S. Billett, C. Harteis, H., & Gruber. (Eds). International Handbook on Research into Professional and Practice-Based Learning. Dordrecht: Springer. Mulder, M. and A. Pachuau (2010). Editorial. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 16, 3, 205-213. Mulder, M., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H.J.A., & Wesselink, R. (2010). The new competence concept in higher education: error or enrichment?. Journal of European Industrial Training. 33. 8/9, 755-770 Nili- Ahmadabadi, M. R., (2010). Application of Educational Technology field for students and approved curriculum, Quarterly Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(14), 73-98, [In Persian]. Rahmanpour. M., Liaghatdar, M. J., Sharifian, F., & Rezaee, M. (2016). Evaluating Current Status of MAEducational Technology Curriculum in Iran from Viewpoint of Experts and Professors in Order to Offering a Desirable Curriculum. International Education Studies; 9, 9, 120-132. Rahmanpour. M. (2015). Examining the Criteria for Accreditation and Measuring of Higher Education Institutions: with an Emphasis on Their Rankings. Higher education letter. (7): 11-47. [In Persian]. Rahmanpour. M., Liaghatdar, M. J., Sharifian, F., & Rezaee, M. (2019). Evaluation of the master curriculum of educational technology from the perspective of graduate students. Technology of Instruction. 13, 2, 363-370[In Persian]. Rasinen, A. (2003). An analysis of the Technology Education Curriculum of six countries, Journal of Technology Education, 1, (15): 31- 47. Rezaee-Bagher, S., Hashemi- Moghadam, S. Sh., & Akbari- Boorang, M. (2009). Survey of MS & MA curriculum of Instructional Technology from the perspective of staff and students, Journal of Letter of Higher Education, 2(8), 69-83, [In Persian]. Naderi, A. (2013). Designing and Validating the Curriculum of Extra-curricular Activities of High School Students: Emphasis on Public Training by Police. Social security studies. (35) 47-82. [In Persian]. Ornstein, A.C., & Hunkins F.P. (2008).Curriculum foundation principles and issue. 5th Ed. A Viacom company, United State of America. Pant, L.P. (2012). Learning and Innovation Competence in Agricultural and Rural Development. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 18, 3, 205-230. Pysarenko, V. (2022). The use of information and communication technologies is the key to improving the efficiency of higher education institutions. Materials Science and Engineering; Bristol. 1256, Iss. 1 Salimi, J., Ma H., Mleki, & Mehrmohammadi, M. (2012). Providinga model of Interdisciplinary Curriculum Desingin Un-dergraguatesocial sciences. Curriculum Research. (2) 105-130. [In Persian]. Thurab-Nkhosi, D., & Marshall, S. (2009). Quality management in course development and delivery at the University of the West Indies distance education centre. Qual Assur Educ, 17(3): 264-80. Wesselink, R., A., Dekker-Groen, H.J.A., Biemans, & Mulder, M. (2011). Using an instrument to analyse competence-based study programmes; experiences of teachers in Dutch vocational education and training. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42, 6, 813-829. Darzi Ramandi. H., Kian. M., Abbasi, E., & Haji Hossein nejad, Gh. (2020). Design and validation of a curriculum pattern based on extracurricular activities in primary education based on Klein model. Journal of Theory & Practice in Curriculum, Vol.14 (7); 2020[in Persian]. Van Den Akker, J., Wang, Q., & Nieveen, N. (2008). Designing a computer support system for multimedia curriculum development in Shanghai, Education Tech Research Dev, (55): 275-295. Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., De Windt, V., Tondeur, J., Hermans, R., & Sinnaeve, I. (2008). Technology curriculum and planning for technology in schools: The Flemish case. TechTrends, 52(2): 23–26. Voogt, J., & Pelgrum, H. (2006). ICT and curriculum change. Human Technology.1, (2):157-175 Yelland, N. (2006). Changing worlds and new curricula in the knowledge era. Educational Media International, (43): 121–131. Zareie-Zavaraki, E. (2007). Analytical review of the graduate curriculum of educational technology to provide an appropriate program. Quarterly Journal of Educational Psychology, 4(13), 112-135. [In Pearsian].
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 216 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 345 |