data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12368/12368c57a9275f81d5fb4177f1912178ebc2e0a9" alt="سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه کردستان"
تعداد نشریات | 31 |
تعداد شمارهها | 334 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,274 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,073,509 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,879,349 |
آسیبشناسی ارزشیابی تکوینی در نظام یادگیری الکترونیکی ایران: واکاوی پدیدارشناسانه دیدگاههای اساتید | ||
تدریس پژوهی | ||
مقاله 2، دوره 11، شماره 2، تیر 1402، صفحه 52-27 اصل مقاله (1.31 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/trj.2023.62814 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
حامد عباسی کسانی* 1؛ غلامرضا شمس مورکانی2؛ فرهاد سراجی3؛ مرتضی رضایی زاده4 | ||
1دانشآموخته دکتری، گروه علومتربیتی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
2دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
3استاد، گروه علومتربیتی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران. | ||
4استادیار، گروه علومتربیتی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف: ارزشیابی تکوینی آن نوع ارزشیابی است که با هدف کمک به یادگیری و بهصورت مستمر، گام به گام، و در طول فرایند یاددهی – یادگیری صورت می گیرد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی آسیب های ارزشیابی تکوینی در نظام یادگیری الکترونیکی ایران انجام گرفت. روش: این پژوهش به لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و به لحاظ نحوه گردآوری اطلاعات از نوع کیفی بود. شرکت کنندگان در پژوهش شامل اساتید مراکز یادگیری الکترونیکی بود که 13 نفر از آن ها با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری هدفمند بهعنوان نمونه پژوهش انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده ها نیز مصاحبه نیمه ساختارمند بود. همچنین جهت تجزیهوتحلیل داده ها از روش کدگذاری تحلیل مضمون استفاده گردید. یافتهها: یافته های پژوهش نشان داد که از نظر اساتید مراکز یادگیری الکترونیکی، ارزشیابی تکوینی در نظام یادگیری الکترونیکی ایران دارای 8 آسیب و ضعف اصلی است که عبارتاند از: عدم استفاده از ابزارهای مختلف ارزشیابی تکوینی، بازخورددهی و بازخوردگیری نامناسب، عدم امکان احراز هویت دانشجویان، ضعف در ارائه های کلاسی، طراحی ضعیف تمرین ها و پروژه ها، ضعف در آزمون های آنلاین، ضعف در بحث و تبادل نظر، و ضعف در گزارش دهی. بنابراین دانشگاه ها و مراکز آموزش الکترونیکی می بایست به ارزشیابی تکوینی بهعنوان یک عامل مهم در توسعه یادگیرندگان و اساتید توجه کنند و همواره در جهت به روزرسانی و رفع آسیب ها و ضعف های سیستم های مدیریت یادگیری و بخصوص در زمینه ارزشیابی تکوینی اقدام نمایند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
ارزشیابی تکوینی؛ نظام یادگیری الکترونیکی؛ پدیدارشناسی؛ اساتید | ||
مراجع | ||
Abbasi Kasani, H., Haji Zeynalgabedini, M., & Raisi, A. (2018). Pathology of University of Medical Sciences e-learning system based on Khan Model. The Journal of Medical Education and Development (JMED), 12(4), 227-238 (In Persian). Abbasi Kasani, H., Shams Mourkani, G.H., Seraji, F., & Rezaeizadeh, M. (2021). Evaluation in e-learning: What, why, how. Development Strategies in Medical Education, 8(1), 80-92 (In Persian). Albano, G., Capuano, N., & Pierri, A. (2017). Adaptive Peer Grading and Formative Assessment. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(1). Aljamal, A., Cader, H., Chiemeke, C., & Speece, M. (2015). Empirical assessment of e-learning on performance in principles of economics. International Review of Economics Education, 18, 37-48. Azmi, F. M., & Kankarej, M. M. (2015). The role of formative assessment in teaching mathematics. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference for e-learning and Distance Education, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Baker, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bowman, N. D., & Wright, A. A. (2018). Does teaching with PowerPoint increase students' learning? A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 126, 376-387. Bazargan, A. (1394). Introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods. Tehran: Didar Publishing (In Persian). Bhattacharya, M., & Coombs, S. (2017). How to enable student formative learning and assessment: Formalytics for learning enhancement. In Proceedings of Innovation Arabia 10, Dubai. Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2008). The effects of multimedia-supported problem-based inquiry on student engagement, empathy, and assumptions about history. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(1), 21-56. Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(4), 273. Buyukkarci, K., & Sahinkarakas, S. (2021). The Impact of Formative Assessment on Students’ Assessment Preferences. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 21(1). Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883-908. Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications. Da Silva, L. F. C., Barbosa, M. W., & Gomes, R. R. (2019). Measuring participation in distance education online discussion forums using social network analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(2), 140-150. Dehnavi, M. K., Sharafi, S. M., & Nematbakhsh, N. (2011). Developing an e-learning model for tracking the continuous attendance of the students. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 24(1). Dlab, M. H., Katic, M. A., & Candrlic, S. (2015). Ensuring formative assessment in e-course with online tests. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (pp. 322-327). IEEE. Dolati, A.A., Jamshidi, L., & Amin Bidokhti, A.A. (2015). Improving the teaching- learning process smart schools from an evaluation perspective. Teaching and Learning Studies, 7(2), 1/69, 1-20 (In Persian). Elson, J. S. (2016). Formative assessment in an online asynchronous learning environment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska Omaha, Nebraska. Farhangi, A.A., Yazdani, H., & Haghshenas, M. (2018). Identification of Learning Management Systems Functional Areas and Limitations (Case Study: E-Learning Center of University of Tehran). Journal of Information Technology Management, 10(2), 331-354 (In Persian). Fenu, G., Marras, M., & Boratto, L. (2018). A multi-biometric system for continuous student authentication in e-learning platforms. Pattern Recognition Letters, 113, 83-92. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 233-252. Habibi, H., Aghapoor, B., Fatemi, M., Khodayari, S., Damirchi, A., & Rahimi, A. (2016). Pathological approach to electronic tests in Iran (Case Study IBT TOEFL). Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 6(24), 145-170 (In Persian). Haghighi, F., Farajollahi, M., & Norozzadeh, R. (2013). Open and Distance Universities Measurement System. Tehran: Awai Noor (In Persian). Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. Hatziapostolou, T., & Paraskakis, I. (2010). Enhancing the Impact of Formative Feedback on Student Learning through an Online Feedback System. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 8(2), 111-122. Hill, A., Arford, T., Lubitow, A., & Smollin, L. M. (2012). “I’m Ambivalent about It” The Dilemmas of PowerPoint. Teaching Sociology, 40(3), 242-256. Huang, W., Yen, D. C., Lin, Z. X., & Huang, J. H. (2004). How to Compete in a Global Education Market Effectively? A Conceptual Framework for Designing a Next Generation eEducation System. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 12(2), 84-107. Kaur, N., Prasad, P. W. C., Alsadoon, A., Pham, L., & Elchouemi, A. (2016, November). An enhanced model of biometric authentication in E-Learning: Using a combination of biometric features to access E-Learning environments. In 2016 International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering (ICAEES) (pp. 138-143). IEEE. Kc, D. (2017). Evaluation of Moodle Features at Kajaani University of Applied Sciences–Case Study. Procedia computer science, 116, 121-128. Kear, K., Rosewell, J., Williams, K., Ossiannilsson, E., Rodrigo, C., Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua, Á., & Mellar, H. (2016). Quality assessment for e-learning: A benchmarking approach. Kearns, L. R. (2012). Student assessment in online learning: Challenges and effective practices. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 198. Khalifeh, Gh., & Razavi, S. A. (2012). Quality Assurance and Evaluation in Electronic Learning Using the Importance-Performance Analysis Model. Media, 3(1), 33-44 (In Persian). King, C. G., Guyette Jr, R. W., & Piotrowski, C. (2009). Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students' views. Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), n1. Ma, Y., Friel, C., & Xing, W. (2014). Instructional activities in a discussion board forum of an e-leaning management system. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 112-116). Springer, Cham. Marriott, P. (2009). Students' evaluation of the use of online summative assessment on an undergraduate financial accounting module. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 237-254. Ming-Li, L., & Dan, M. (2010). The method of learning formative assessment in distance education. In Educational and Information Technology (ICEIT), 2010 International Conference on (3, pp. V3-113). IEEE. Pleva, M., Bours, P., Hladek, D., & Juhar, J. (2016). Using current biometrics technologies for authentication in e-learning assessment. In 2016 International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) (pp. 269-274). IEEE. Poordavood, M., Usefzadeh, M., Katueian Javadi, R., & Ahghar, G. (2020). Identify the features of curriculum basic elements based on Steiner model (A mixed research). Research in Teaching, 8(4), 12-1 (In Persian). Rabuzin, K., Baca, M., & Sajko, M. (2006). E-learning: Biometrics as a Security Factor. In Computing in the Global Information Technology, 2006. ICCGI'06. International Multi-Conference on (pp. 64-64). IEEE. Roshani Ali bena see, H., Fathi Vajargah, K., & Khorasani, A. (2017). The Challenges of the Quality Evaluation of Virtual Education Curriculum: The Case of Shahid Beheshti University. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 7(18), 29-52 (In Persian). Sari, M. S., Sunarmi, Sulasmi, E. S., & Mawaddah, K. (2019). Formative assessment in project-based learning: Supporting alternative on the learning outcome of biology students in university. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2120, No. 1, p. 060009). AIP Publishing LLC. Scully, D. (2017). Constructing multiple-choice items to measure higher-order thinking. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 22(1), 4. Shaul, M. (2008). Assessing online discussion forum participation. In Information Communication Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1459-1467). IGI Global. Sheela, M. I. M. I., & Nimako, E. (2020). A Study on the Major Phenomenon Surrounding Biometric Authentication in E-Learning. Studies in Indian Place Names, 40(53), 41-45. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189. Skinner, D. (2004). The homework wars. Public Interest, (154), 49. Taha, M. (2014). Investigating the success of E-learning in secondary schools: The case of the Kingdom of Bahrain, Doctoral dissertation of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University. Tella, A., & Adu, E. O. (2014). An assessment of the undergraduates’ participation in the online discussion forum. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(7), 333-333. Torres, J. O. (2019). Positive impact of utilizing more formative assessment over summative assessment in the EFL/ESL Classroom. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 9(1), 1-11. Townsend, S., & Mulvey, B. (2016). Formative assessment via online quizzes in the EFL classroom: An ICT pilot teaching program. assessment. Yan, Z., Li, Z., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang, L., & Lao, H. (2021). A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1-33. Zamani, B., Parhizi, R., & Kaviani, H. (2015). Identify Challenges of Evaluating Students' Academic Performance E-Courses. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 9(2), 105-112 (In Persian). Zareisaroukolaei, M., Shams, G., Rezaeizadeh, M., & Ghahremani, M. (2020). Determinants of e-learning effectiveness: A qualitative study on the instructor. Research in Teaching, 8(2), 79-55 (In Persian). Zareisaroukolaei, M., Shams, G., Rezaeizadeh, M., & Ghahremani, M. (2020). Determinants of e-learning effectiveness: A qualitative study on the instructor. Research in Teaching, 8(2), 79-55 (In Persian). Zeki, K. A. Y. A., & Seref, T. A. N. (2014). New trends of measurement and assessment in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 206-217. Zhu, M., Liu, O. L., & Lee, H. S. (2020). The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing. Computers & Education, 143, 103668. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 398 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 367 |