| تعداد نشریات | 34 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 434 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,099 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,622,206 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,778,066 |
باورهای معلمان درباره دانشآموزان سرآمد و فعالیتهای آموزشی مناسب برای آنها: یک پژوهش کیفی | ||
| تدریس پژوهی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 12، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 35، فروردین 1403، صفحه 49-75 اصل مقاله (1.17 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/trj.2024.138978.1778 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سعید صفدری* 1؛ محمد غفاری مجلج2 | ||
| 1گروه زبان انگلیسی، واحد چالوس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، چالوس، ایران | ||
| 2گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد چالوس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، چالوس، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| شناسایی دانشآموزان سرآمد و تدوین و اجرای روشهای کارآمد آموزشی برای آنها از دغدغههای هر نظام آموزشی است و معلمان مهمترین و تاثیرگذارترین عوامل دخیل در این فرآیند به شمار میروند. بنابراین، پژوهش کیفی حاضر به جستجو در باورهای معلمان در این دو موضوع میپردازد. جامعه آماری معلمان متوسطه اول در سه شهر غرب مازندران بودند که 14 نفر از ایشان (هفت مرد و هفت زن) از طریق نمونهگیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. دادههای پژوهش با استفاده از مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته جمعآوری شد. سپس، دادهها بر مبنای تحلیل محتوای مضمونی مورد کدگذاری و تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. تحلیل دادهها، در بخش مربوط به باورهای معلم درباره دانشآموزان سرآمد، به پیدایش چهار مضمون کلی توانمندی شناختی، توانمندی فراشناختی، مهارتهای اجتماعی، رفتار کلاسی منتهی شد. همچنین، در بخش مربوط به فعالیتهای آموزشی معلمان هم سه مضمون کلی روش تدریس، تکالیف و تمرینات، نقش هدایت معلم حاصل شد. یافتهها نشان دادند که معلمان از درک عمیق و چندبعدی در تشخیص سرآمدان برخوردارند و از سطح معیارهای عملکردی و شناختی ساده فراتر میروند. آنها همچنین درباره فعالیتهای آموزشی مناسب نیز دیدگاههای خلاق و نوآورانهای دارند. در پایان پیشنهادهایی برای بهبود فرآیندهای آموزشی و پژوهشی مرتبط ارائه شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| دانشآموزان سرآمد؛ باورهای معلمان؛ تحلیل محتوای مضمونی؛ فعالیتهای آموزشی | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abolghasemi, M., Zinalipour, H., Shikhi, A., Assare, A. (2018). Designing of optimum evaluation strategy among gifted students of isfahan: a mix method study. Journal of Research in Teaching, 6(1), 25-41. [in Persian] Aboobakri Makoei S, Kaboli K, Qasemi S, Chagosaz M, Safa S, & Karami, S. (2021). Effect of short-term solution-focused approach on the coping strategies and mental toughness of outstanding students. JOEC, 21(1), 126-115. [in Persian] Ahmadnejad, M., & Fathi, J. (2019). The contribution of an EFL blog-mediated writing course to enhancing learner autonomy. Journal of Research in Teaching, 7(2), 141-160. [in Persian] Barbier, K., Donche, V., & Verschueren, K. (2019). Academic (under)achievement of intellectually gifted students in the transition between primary and secondary education: An individual learner perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2533. Barbier, K., Struyf, E., & Donche, V. (2022). Teachers' beliefs about and educational practices with high-ability students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103566 Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2016). Teachers' conceptions of gifted and averageability students on achievement-relevant dimensions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216647115 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Brevik, L. M., Gunnulfsen, A. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (2018). Student teachers' practice and experience with differentiated instruction for students with higher learning potential. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.003 Civitillo, S., Denessen, E., & Molenaar, I. (2016). How to see the classroom through the eyes of a teacher: Consistency between perceptions on diversity and differentiation practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16(S1), 587-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12190 Dare, L., & Nowicki, E. (2023). ‘The road less travelled’: Grade-level acceleration in inclusive schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 27(2), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1837265 Dare, L., Nowicki, E. A., & Smith, S. (2019). On deciding to accelerate: High-ability students identify key considerations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219828073 Eyni S., Hosseini, S. A., & Ebadi, M. (2022). Comparison of psychological distress, mindfulness and academic self-efficacy in gifted and normal students. Rooyesh-e- Ravanshenasi, 10(11), 1-14. [in Persian] Fakharian, J., Yaghoubi, A., Zargham Hajebi, M., & Mohagheghi, H. (2019). The designing of academic buoyancy model based on family emotional climate, social constructive learning environment, and academic engagement mediated by academic self-efficacy in high school girl students. Journal of Research in Teaching, 7(3), 1-25. [in Persian] Guez, A., Peyre, H., Le Cam, M., Gauvrit, N., & Ramus, F. (2018). Are high-IQ students more at risk of school failure? Intelligence, 71, 32-40. Hashemi, N., & Khorouti, F. (2020). Comparison of the academic motivation, self-regulation and self- worth of the gifted and normal students in Karaj. Educational Innovations, 19(1), 147-162. [in Persian] Hejazi, E., Abbasi, F., Hakimzadeh, R., & Ejei, J. (2021). Flourishing profile of gifted students based on Seligman's PERMA model: A study of gender differences. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 17(4), 221-240. [in Persian] Heller, K. A., M€onks, F. J., Subotnik, R., & Sternberg, R. (2000). International handbook of giftedness and talent. Elsevier. Heshmati, R., & Maanifar, S. (2018). Metacognition, mindfulness, and spiritual well-being in gifted high school students. Health, Spirituality and Medical Ethics, 5(3), 22-28. [in Persian] Hornstra, L., Bakx, A., Mathijssen, S., & Denissen, J. (2020). Motivating gifted and non-gifted students in regular primary schools: A self-determination perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 80, 101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101871 Isazadegan, A., Mika’ili Mani, F., Jenabadi, H., & Qolinejad, F. (2013). A comparison of thinking styles and emotional creativity between gifted and ordinary students. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 3(11), 107-126. [in Persian] Kaiser, J., Retelsdorf, J., Südkamp, A., & M€oller, J. (2013). Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.06.001 Kanevsky, L., & Keighley, T. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554235 Kim, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216630607 Lavrijsen, J., & Verschueren, K. (2020). Student characteristics affecting the recognition of high cognitive ability by teachers and peers. Learning and Individual Differences, 78, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101820 Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.137 Machts, N., Kaiser, J., Schmidt, F. T. C., & M€oller, J. (2016). Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 19, 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.003 Mahmoodi, Z., & Kadivar, P. (2019). The school climate and emotional intelligence in gifted and non-gifted students: A multilevel analysis. Innovation and Creativity in Human Sciences, 8(4), 219-256. [in Persian] Moradizadeh S., Bazgir, L., & Sepahvand, E. (2019). Study and comparison of emotional, social, educational, self-regulation and test anxiety among gifted and normal boy students in Khoramabad city. Rooyesh-e- Ravanshenasi, 8(7), 39-48. [in Persian] Nazarian, M. R., Abedi, A., Mahdad, A., & Nadi, M. A. (2020). Teachers’ lived experiences in identifying students’ talents based on the dimensions and components of the effective teaching pattern. New Educational Approaches, 15(2), 43-58. [in Persian] Obergriesser, S., & Stoeger, H. (2015). The role of emotions, motivation, and learning behavior in underachievement and results of an intervention. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 167-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1043003 Parsons, S. A., Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Davis, S. G., & Allen, M. (2018). Teachers' instructional adaptations: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 205-242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743198 Popa, N. L., & Pauc, R. L. (2015). Dynamic assessment, potential giftedness and mathematics achievement in elementary school. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(2), 23-32. Pourmand, R., Norozi, D., Zarei Zavaraki, E., & Delavar, A. (2017). Investigating the effect of the group teaching method on simultaneous learning of common topics with different complexity levels on students learning in multigrade classes. Journal of Research in Teaching, 5(3), 23-37. [in Persian] Preckel, F., Baudson, T. G., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2015). Gifted and maladjusted? Implicit attitudes and automatic associations related to gifted children. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1160-1184. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215596413 Reis, S. M., & Peters, P. M. (2020). Research on the schoolwide enrichment model: Four decades of insights, innovation, and evolution. Gifted Education International, Article 0261429420963987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420963987 Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.012 Richards, J., Encel, J., & Shute, R. (2003). The emotional and behavioural of intellectually gifted adolescents: A multi-dimensional, multi-informant approach. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813032000163889 Ridgley, L., Rubenstein, L., & Callan, G. (2020). Gifted underachievement within a self-regulated learning framework: Proposing a task-dependent model to guide early identification and intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 57(9), 1365-1384. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22408 Sayadi, Y., & Soleimani, H. (2022). Investigating the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic enthusiasm with regard to the mediating role of self-regulation among English language students. Journal of Research in Teaching, 10(1), 81-106. [in Persian] Scager, K., Akkerman, S. F., Pilot, A., & Wubbels, T. (2014). Challenging high-ability students. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 659-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03075079.2012.743117 Schiefer, J., Stark, L., Gaspard, H., Wille, E., Trautwein, U., & Golle, J. (2021). Scaling up an extracurricular science intervention for elementary school students: It works, and girls benefit more from it than boys. Journal of Educational Psychology. 113(4), 784-807. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000630 Schroth, S. T., & Helfer, J. A. (2008). Identifying Gifted Students: Educator Beliefs regarding Various Policies, Processes, and Procedures. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(2), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2008-850 Schuitema, J., Palha, S., van Boxtel, C., & Peetsma, T. (2019). Effects of task structure and group composition on elaboration and metacognitive activities of highability students during collaborative learning. Pedagogische Studies, 96(2), 136-151. Sepahvand, T., & Mirchenari, M. (2020). Comparison of self-regulated learning strategies and implicit beliefs of intelligence in gifted and normal second high school students. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 8(15), 145-160. [in Persian] Shabani Z, Ghanbari Panah M, & Abolghasemi, M. (2021). Comparison of metacognitive beliefs, mind control strategies and documentary styles in outstanding and normal students. Exceptional Children, 21(3), 79-92. [in Persian] Sharp, J. E., Niemiec, R. M., & Lawrence, C. (2017). Using mindfulnessbased strengths practices with gifted populations. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 131-144. Snyder, K., & Wormington, S. (2020). Gifted underachievement and achievement motivation: The promise of breaking silos. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 63-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220909179 Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K-12 students' academic achievement: Findings of two secondorder meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849-899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417 Sternberg, R. J. (2003). WICS as a model of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 109-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813032000163807 Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056 van Dijk, A. M., Eysink, T. H. S., & de Jong, T. (2016). Ability-related differences in performance of an inquiry task: The added value of prompts. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.008 Van Mieghem, A., Verschueren, K., Petry, K., & Struyf, E. (2020). An analysis of research on inclusive education: A systematic search and meta review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24, 675-689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1482012 VanTassel-Baska, J. (2018). Achievement unlocked: Effective curriculum interventions with low-income students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 68-82. Verschueren, K., Lavrijsen, J., Weyns, T., Ramos, A., & Fraine, B. (2019). Social acceptance of high-ability youth: Multiple perspectives and contextual influences. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 168, 27-46 https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20316, 2019. Weyns, T., Preckel, F., & Verschueren, K. (2020). Teachers-in-training perceptions of gifted children's characteristics and teacher-child interactions: An experimental study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103215 Zamani, A., Pouratashi, M., Bagherianfar, M. (2023). The relationship between faculty members' teaching styles with students' academic enthusiasm and academic performance. Journal of Research in Teaching, 11(3), 150-175. [in Persian] Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2017). Emotional intelligence in gifted students. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 163-182. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 575 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 507 |
||