رهیافت فراترکیب در حوزه مطالعات مکان‌سازی با رویکرد بیوفیلیک

Achterbergh, l., pitman, a., birken, m., pearce, e., sno, h., & johnson, s. (2020). the experience of loneliness among young people with depression: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the literature. bmc psychiatry, 20(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02818-3

Ahmadi, K. rokhandeh, n, hamzepour, me. sohrabi, f. (2023). systematic conceptualization of administrative discipline using metacombination method. human resource management research, 15(2). [in persian]

Amat, r. c., ismail, s., wahab, m. h., ahmad, n. h., & rani, w. n. m. w. m. (2020). a dimension of biophilia in urban design. in iop conference series: earth and environmental science (vol. 409, no. 1, p. 012016). iop publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/409/1/012016

Ancher, k. (2007). placemaking, urban design and power relations in a local government context: the case of glenorchy, tasmania (doctoral dissertation, university of tasmania). https://doi.org/10.25959/23209994.v1 

Bahmani h, zhang w. why do communities recover differently after socio-natural disasters? pathways to comprehensive success of recovery projects based on bam's (iran) neighborhoods' perspective. int j environ res public health. 2022 jan 7;19(2):678. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020678. pmid: 35055499; pmcid: pmc8775569.

Barbiero g, berto r. biophilia as evolutionary adaptation: an onto- and phylogenetic framework for biophilic design. front psychol. 2021 jul 21;12:700709. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700709. pmid: 34367025; pmcid: pmc8334556.

Boffi m, pola l, fumagalli n, fermani e, senes g, inghilleri p. nature experiences of older people for active ageing: an interdisciplinary approach to the co-design of community gardens. front psychol. 2021 sep 27;12:702525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702525. pmid: 34646195; pmcid: pmc8503679.

Brownett t, evans o. finding common ground: the conception of community arts festivals as spaces for placemaking. health place. 2020 jan;61:102254. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102254. epub 2019 nov 22. pmid: 31767274.

Chrastina, J. (2018). Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies: Background, Methodology and Applications. nordsci. https://org/10.32008/NORDSCI2018/B1/V1/13

Cobreros, c., medoza-ruvalcaba, n., flores-garcía, m., & roggema, r. (2023). improving psychological well-being in urban university districts through biophilic design: two cases in mexico. sustainability, 15(7), 5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075703

Dalpra m. rethinking play environments for social inclusion in our communities. stud health technol inform. 2022 sep 2;297:218-225. doi: 10.3233/shti220842. pmid: 36073398.

Degele, p. e. (2023). protected areas in land use planning policies: key articulation for territorial justice. environmental science & policy, 140, 189-201. doi: 1016/j.envsci.2022.11.020

Downton, p., jones, d., zeunert, j., & roös, p. (2017). biophilic design applications: putting theory and patterns into built environment practice. kne engineering, 59-65. https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v2i2.596

Eid, s., khalifa, m., and abd elrahman, a. s. (2021). biophilic perceptions in theurban waterfront: analytical study of the nile waterfront in central cairo. hbrcj. 17, 19–39. doi: 10.1080/16874048.2021.

Ellery, p. j., ellery, j., & borkowsky, m. (2021). toward a theoretical understanding of placemaking. international journal of community well-being, 4(1), 55-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00072-9

Feast, a., orrell, m., charlesworth, g., poland, f., featherstone, k., melunsky, n., & moniz-cook, e. (2018). using meta-ethnography to synthesize relevant studies: capturing the bigger picture in dementia with challenging behavior within families. sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301218791970

Gauss, l., lacerda, d. p., & cauchick miguel, p. a. (2021). module-based product family design: systematic literature review and meta-synthesis. journal of intelligent manufacturing, 32, 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01472-x

Ghavampour, e., & vale, b. (2019). revisiting the “model of place”: a comparative study of placemaking and sustainability. urban planning, 4(2), 196-206. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i2.2027

Herber, o. r., & barroso, j. (2020). lessons learned from applying sandelowski and barroso’s approach for synthesising qualitative research. qualitative research, 20(4), 414-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119860268

Iucn—international union for nature conservation (2016) naturebased solutions to address global societal challenges. cohen-shacham e, walters g, jqanzen c, maginnis s (eds). iucn, gland, switzerland. https ://porta ls.iucn.org/libra ry/node/46191

Kellert, s. r. (2008). “dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design,” in biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life, eds s. kellert, j. Heerwagen, and m. mador (hoboken, nj: john Wiley & Sons), 3–19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284608721_Dimensions_elements_and_attributes_of_biophilic_design

Lee, s., & kim, y. (2021). a framework of biophilic urbanism for improving climate change adaptability in urban environments. Urban forestry & urban greening, 61, 127104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127104

Mandić, a. (2019). Nature-based solutions for sustainable tourism development in protected natural areas: a review. Environment Systems and Decisions, 39(3), 249-268 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-9797-3

Marion jl. trail sustainability: a state-of-knowledge review of trail impacts, influential factors, sustainability ratings, and planning and management guidance. j environ manage. 2023 aug 15;340:117868. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117868. epub 2023 apr 21. pmid: 37087890.

Mcclenaghan, l. r., and m. s. gaines. 1981. genic and morphological variability in central and marginal populations of sigmodon hispidus. in m. h. smith and j. joule (eds.), mammalian population genetics. university of georgia press, athens, Georgia.https://doi.org/10.2307/1380051

Morges, switzerland ,for their conservation. pages 15-59 in proceedings, international conference on marine parks andreserves, tokyo, 12-14 may1975. iucn publication newseries no. 37 https://portals.iucn.org/library.

O’regan, a. c., hunter, r. f., & nyhan, m. m. (2021). “biophilic cities”: quantifying the impact of google street view-derived greenspace exposures on socioeconomic factors and self-reported health. environmental science & technology, 55(13), 9063-9073.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00048

Oladipo oladeji, s., & fatukasi, d. (2017). a participatory approach to conservation and management of protected areas in nigeria: a case study of osse river park project. african journal of environmental science and technology, 11(9), 471–485.https://doi.org/10.5897/ajest2014.1720

Pinho, p., correia, o., lecoq, m., munzi, s., vasconcelos, s., gonçalves, p., rebelo, r., antunes, c., silva, p., freitas, c., lopes, n., santos-reis, m., & branquinho, c. (2016). evaluating green infrastructure in urban envi-ronments using a multi-taxa and functional diversity approach. environmental research, 147, 601–610. https:// dx. oi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.025

Ramli, n. a., & ujang, n. (2021). the functions of urban design social attributes in creative placemaking: the case of kuala lumpur event festivals. open house international, 46(2), 230-249. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2021-0023

Shakerian, m., jahangiri, m., alimohammadlou, m., nami, m., & choobineh, a. (2019). individual cognitive factors affecting unsafe acts among iranian industrial workers: an integrative meta-synthesis interpretive structural modeling (ism) approach. safety science, 120, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.007

Shoelh, f., golabchi, m., & haji yakhchali, s. (2019). a conceptual framework of contextual factors affecting knowledge transfer using meta-synthesis method. journal of industrial and systems engineering, 12(2), 9-30. https://www.jise.ir/article_81765.html. .‎ [In Persian]

Shwartz, a., turbé, a., julliard, r., simon, l., & prévot, a.-c. (2014). outstanding challenges for urban conservation research and action. global environmental change, 28, 39–49. https://org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.00

Smith b. philanthropy: the intersection of values and love. health prog. 2017 mar-apr;98(2):56-7. pmid: 30039948. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30039948/

Smith, p. g., & theberge, j. b. (1986). a review of criteria for evaluating natural areas. environmental management, 10, 715-734atural areas https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0186732

Switalski, m., torres, m. g., & grêt-regamey, a. (2023). the 3p’s of place-making: measuring place-making through the latent components of person, procedures and place. landscape and urban planning, 238, 104817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104817

Tekeyan, F, Jahanian, M. (2022). Analyzing the architectural model of competence of workers in the tourism industry. Tourism and Development, 12(3), 1-22.‎ [In Persian]. 22034/jtd.2023.364116.2671

Tekin, b. h., corcoran, r., & gutiérrez, r. u. (2023). a systematic review and conceptual framework of biophilic design parameters in clinical environments. herd: health environments research & design journal, 16(1), 233-250. doi: 10.1177/19375867221118675

Tian, L. (2022). Analysis of the artistic effect of garden plant landscaping in urban greening. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 202https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2430067

Toolis ee. theorizing critical placemaking as a tool for reclaiming public space. am j community psychol. 2017 mar;59(1-2):184-199. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12118. epub 2017 feb 13. pmid: 28191650

Totaforti, S. (2020). Emerging biophilic urbanism: the value of the human–nature relationship in the urban space. Sustainability, 12(13), https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135487

Toyoda a, shibata y, matsuo y, terada k, sugimoto h, higashi k, mori h, ikeuchi a, ito m, kurokawa k, katahira s. diversity and compositional differences of the airborne microbiome in a biophilic indoor environment. sci rep. 2023 may 20;13(1):8179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34928-9. pmid: 37210416; pmcid: pmc10199911.

Tulloch ait, auerbach n, avery-gomm s, bayraktarov e, butt n, dickman cr, ehmke g, fisher do, grantham h, holden mh, lavery th, leseberg np, nicholls m, o'connor j, roberson l, smyth ak, stone z, tulloch v, turak e, wardle gm, watson jem. a decision tree for assessing the risks and benefits of publishing biodiversity data. nat ecol evol. 2018 aug;2(8):1209-1217. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0608-1. epub 2018 jul 23. pmid: 30038417.

Twedt e, rainey rm, proffitt dr. designed natural spaces: informal gardens are perceived to be more restorative than formal gardens. front psychol. 2016 feb 11;7:88. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00088. pmid: 26903899; pmcid: pmc4749713.

Woods, v., & knuth, m. (2023). the biophilia reactivity hypothesis: biophilia as a temperament trait, or more precisely, a domain specific attraction to biodiversity. journal of bioeconomics, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-023-09342-w

Yalcinalp, e., ozveren, s., meral, a., pulatkan, m., & akbulut, s. (2017). habitat effect on urban roof vegetation. Sustainability, 9(11), 1985. https://doi. rg/10.3390/su9111985.

Yang y, song f, ma j, wei z, song l, cao w. spatial and temporal variation of heat islands in the main urban area of zhengzhou under the two-way influence of urbanization and urban forestry. plos one. 2022 aug 10;17(8): e0272626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272626. pmid: 35947622; pmcid: pmc9365148.

Yin j, arfaei n, macnaughton p, catalano pj, allen jg, spengler jd. effects of biophilic interventions in office on stress reaction and cognitive function: a randomized crossover study in virtual reality. indoor air. 2019 nov;29(6):1028-1039. doi: 10.1111/ina.12593. epub 2019 sep 11. pmid: 31418925.

Yin j, yuan j, arfaei n, catalano pj, allen jg, spengler jd. effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: a between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. environ int. 2020 mar;136:105427. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105427. epub 2019 dec 24. pmid: 31881421.