تحلیل انتقادی مقاله‌‌های حوزه‌ی «تحلیل محتوای کتاب‌‌های علوم‌تجربی دوره‌ی ابتدایی» با تأکید بر شیوه‌های آموزش و تدریس

Amir Ahmadi, Y., Irawani, Sh., & Sharifi, M. R. (2012). »Content analysis of fifthgrade elementary experimental science of textbook based on Dewey problem solving model«. Journal of research in curriculum planning, 9 (8): 86-95. (inPersian).

Atabak, R., Babarahmati, F., & Atabak, M. (2019). »Content analysis of the new book of the sixth elementary experimental science by William Rome's method in the academic year 2016-2017«. Journal of Pooyesh in Humanities Education, 4 (14): 11-27. (in Persian).

Azimi, M. (2020). »Content analysis of the experimental sciences course of the thirdgrade of primary school based on the assumptions of the health system in theschools of the Islamic Republic of Iran«. journal of pooyesh quarterly in basic science education, 6 (18): 38-50. (in Persian).

Babaee, M., Yazdanpanah, Sh., & Azagh, H. (2021). Critical content analysis of "national research action" in the academic and behavioral domains of studentsas a teaching method (From four areas: structural, writing, methodological and content). Journal of Research in Teaching, 9 (2): 1-28. (in Persian).

Farasat, H., Aminamiri, M., & Mahawy, M. (2019). »content analysis of the first, second and third elementary experimental science textbooks based on the pattern of display of Merrill components«. journal of pooyesh quarterly in basic science education, 5 (16): 50-62. (in Persian).

Fathi, M., Saadatmand, Z., & Yosefi, A. (2019). »Identifying the components andanalyzing the content of the elementary school curriculum based on the document of fundamental change«. journal of research in educational systems,14 (49): 69-81. (in Persian).

Fazl olahi, S., & Maleki Tawana, M. (2011). »Evaluating the readability of the third-grade elementary science textbook based on five formulas: Fry, Gunning, Flash, Laughlin and Close«. journal of Iranian curriculum studies, 6 (22): 141-

162. (in Persian).

Garmabi, H. A. (2016). »content analysis of elementary school textbooks from the perspective of Guilford creativity index, quarterly«. journal of preschool and elementary studies, 2 (5): 17- 32. (in Persian).

Ghaderi rousing, A., & Kondori, F. (2019). Descriptive content analysis of the pictures in elementary school textbooks based on gender justice criteria.Pouyesh journal in teaching educational sciences and counseling, 5 (11): 86-

104. (in Persian).

Ghaedi, M. R., & Golshani, M.R. (2018). »content analysis methods from quantitative to qualitative«. journal of psychological, methods and models, 7 (23): 57-82. (in Persian).

Ghodsi, A. (2004). »content analysis of experimental science textbooks of fifth grade and it’s fit with the mental capacity of Tehran students«. journal of education,80: 1-33. (in Persian).

Gilvand A., Moosavi A., Gilvand, M., & Moosavi, Z. (2016). »Content analysis of the science textbooks of Iranian junior high school course in terms of the components of health education«. Int J peditor, 36: 5057-4069.

Gumilar, S., & Ismail, A. (2023). The representation of laboratory activities inindonesian physics textbooks: a content analysis. Research in Science Technological Education, 41(2), 614-634.

Hasanlo, H., Faraji, khiyavi, Z., & shokrolahi, R. (2012). »Content analysis of fourth and fifth experimental science books based on Merriles educationalobjectives«. Journal of research in curriculum planning, 2 (6): 116-130. (in Persian).

Hashemi, S., khabazy Kenary, M., & Shabani, R. (2015). »Imaginative Thinking in science education: content analysis of science textbooks elementary course based on the components of imagination«. scientific- research journal”

curriculum research”, 5 (1): 121, 144. (in Persian).

Husseini yazdi, A. S., & Ahmadian, M. (2014). »Content analysis of elementary school textbooks of experimental sciences in terms of addressing a variety of course questions«. Journal of research in curriculum planning, 2 (16): 132-

147. (in Persian).

Jafari harandi, R. (2018). »Content analysis of experimental science textbook in theelementary, school of Iran based on the components of Eduard Dubono's thought«. quarterly journal of new thoughts on education, 14 (3): 137-163. (in Persian).

Jafari harandi, R., Mirshah Jafari, E., & Liaghatdar, j. (2013). »investing the views of experts and teachers regarding the teaching of Iranian science curriculum in order to propose an appropriate model of science education curriculum«.

Scientific-research Journal of Shahed University, 20 (3): 79-100. (in Persian).

Javidi Kalate Jafarabadi, T., Mehram, B., & Jahangard, F. (2018). »Challenges inexperimental science education«. National conference of new achievements of the world in education, psychology, law and social cultural studies, 1. (in Persian).

Keban, N. V., Muhtar, A., & Zen, E. L. (2012). A content analysis on English for kidsgrade 3, a textbook used in elementary schools in Malang. RetrievedFebruary, 4, 2014.‏

Krippendoroff, A. (2004). Content analysis an introduction to its methodology.international educational and professional publisher, PP: 1-422.

Mai, M. Y., Yusuf, M., & Saleh, M. (2019). Content analysis for critical thinking skills in the lower primary school science textbooks in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 6(1), 83-91.

Mayring, M. (2000). »Qualitative content analysis«. qualitative social research, 2, 1-10.

Mohammadnia, ZH., & Deliery Moghadam, F. (2019). »Textbooks as resources for education for sustainable development: A Content Analysis«. Journal ofTeacher Education for Sustainability, 21 (1): 103-114.

Niknafas, S., & AliAbadi, KH. (2013). »the role of content analysis in the process ofteaching and designing Textbooks«. world media magazine-Persian edition, 8 (2): 124-150. (in Persian).

Rasmi abed, E., & Al-Abasi, M. (2015). »Content analysis of Jordanian Elementary textbooks during 1970-2013 as case study«. international education studies, 3,PP: 159-166.

Purwanto, N. A., & Herwin, H. (2022). Model Development for School Committee and Education Board Empowerment in Indonesian EducationSystem. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 155-167.‏

Safaryeh, M. (2018). »Investigating the content analysis of the third elementaryexperimental science book from the perspective of activity and inactivity based on model of William Rumi«. pooyesh quarterly in educational sciences and

counseling, 4 (9): 63-89. (in Persian).

Shahmohammadi, N. (2013). »Content analysis of elementary science text books based on the achievement motivation construct«. social and behavioral science,84: 426-430.

Singh, P., Yusoff, N. M., & Hoon, T. S. (2020). »Content Analysis of Primary SchoolMathematics Textbooks and Its Relationship with Pupils Achievement«. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 15-25.‏

Tawoosy, R., Mozareii, M., & Talebi, E. (2019). »content analysis of the sixth-grade elementary experimental science book based on the Merrile Model in the academic year 2018-2019«. Pooyesh quarterly in basic science education, 5 (16): 25-41. (in Persian).

Zavvar, T., Abdollahi Asl, S., Bahari, P., & Delkhosh, V. (2022). Lived Experienceof Teachers From Teaching Multi-Grade Classrooms. Journal of Research in Teaching, 10 (2): 112-143. (in Persian).