پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 376 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,668 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,683,426 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,225,207 |
The Impact of Teacher Training Courses (in-service training) on ELT Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Learner Autonomy | ||
| School Administration | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 13، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 31، تیر 2025، صفحه 96-108 اصل مقاله (416.42 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Mixed Method Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jsa.2025.143213.2569 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Farzad Rashidi1؛ Saeideh Ahangari* 2؛ Ali Asghar Yousefi Azarfam3 | ||
| 1Department of English , Ta. C., Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 2Department of English, Ta.C,, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 3Department of English, Sou.C., Islamic Azad university, Soufian, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The autonomy of learners (AL) is a concept that is increasingly becoming popular in English Language Teaching (ELT). This study sought to explore the effects of in-service training on the perceptions and practices of Iranian EFL teachers in terms of learner autonomy. The use of mixed methods enabled the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data from the Learner Autonomy Questionnaire (LAQ) (Borg & Al-Busaidi, 2012) as well as classroom observations and semi-structured interviews. Twenty teachers from an Iranian EFL context enrolled in a 30-hour in-service training focusing on autonomy-supportive practices for EFL. The results of quantitative data analyzed through descriptive statistics and repeated-measures ANOVA showed significant differences on teachers’ perceptions (F = 93.57, p = .00, η2= .83) and practices (F = 237.52, p = .00, η2= .92). Thematic qualitative analysis of interviews showed that teachers’ beliefs with regard to learner autonomy became comprehensive and multi-faceted resulting in greater use of reflective practices, goal-setting, and collaborative problem solving. These findings corroborate existing literature, , while also emphasizing the need to incorporate practical training as a component in teacher development programs (TDP) in a bid to transform knowledge into practice within the classroom. These findings are relevant to curriculum development, teacher training, and future learner autonomy research in EFL contexts. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| mixed methods؛ teaching؛ learning | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Agustina, D. (2017). Learner autonomy and teacher practices in EFL classrooms: Insights from reflective practices. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 158–166.
Al Asmari, A. R. (2013). Teacher professional development: Practices and perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 6(4), 38–47.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press.
Balcikanli, C. (2010). Learner autonomy in language learning: Student teachers’ beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 90–103.
Bashiri, H., Hadidi, N., & Seifoori, Z. (2014). EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding learner autonomy in Iran: An exploratory study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(3), 674–684.
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd Ed.). Routledge.
Benson, P., & Voller, P. (1997). Autonomy and independence in language learning. Longman.
Borg, S. (2018). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding learner autonomy. English Language Teaching Journal, 65(1), 91–99.
Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. British Council ELT Research Papers, 1–40.
Bullock, D. (2011). Learner autonomy and the theory-practice divide. ELT Journal, 65(4), 347–355.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). Routledge.
DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 195–221.
Dogan, G. (2015). The impact of teacher training on fostering learner autonomy in EFL classrooms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(4), 645–652.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Farahani, A. (2013). Teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about learner autonomy in the Iranian EFL context. Language Learning Journal, 41(3), 256–267.
Feryok, A. (2013). Teaching for learner autonomy: The teacher’s role and sociocultural theory. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 213–225.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd Ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teachers’ classroom behavior: Novice and experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 161–182.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Pergamon Press.
Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233.
Karimi, M. N. (2011). Variability in EFL teachers' beliefs about learner autonomy. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 8(4), 137–163.
Karimi, M. N., & Nazari, A. (2017). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and their teaching practices: The case of learner autonomy. Applied Research in English Language, 6(2), 213–234.
Kohonen, V. (1992). Experiential language learning: Second language learning as cooperative learner education. Routledge Applied Linguistics Series, 4(3), 34–54.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. Yale University Press.
Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Ablex Publishing.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues, and problems. Authentik.
Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175–181.
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29.
Mann, S., & Walsh, S. (2017). Reflective practice in English language teaching: Research-based principles and practices. Routledge.
Nakata, Y. (2011). New understandings of teacher autonomy in language learning. System, 39(3), 344–354.
Nazari, A. (2016). A comparative study of EFL teachers’ beliefs about learner autonomy. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 85–104.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. McGraw-Hill Education.
Pennington, M. C. (1992). Second language teacher education. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2003). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd Ed.). Cambridge University Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 67 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 48 |
||