پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 381 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,732 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,986,088 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,373,351 |
Tracing Nicholas Royle’s Concept of the Uncanny in the Characterization of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein | ||
| Critical Literary Studies | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 8، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 15، دی 2025، صفحه 35-56 اصل مقاله (626.75 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/cls.2025.64024 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Melika Afzal1؛ Hossein Mohseni* 2 | ||
| 1MA in English Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) is a cornerstone of Gothic literature, renowned for its dark settings and themes of death, isolation, and vengeance, all of which evoke terror. These elements create profound unease in readers, which Sigmund Freud calls the uncanny. While Freud’s psychoanalytic account emphasizes repressed fears and childhood anxieties, Nicholas Royle’s expanded theory redefines the uncanny as a literary mode which destabilizes identity. This article aims to apply Royle’s theoretical framework to analyze Shelley’s characterization of Victor Frankenstein and his Creature, focusing on five central concepts: silence and isolation, thought, the double, the phantom, and the death drive and repetition. From this vantage point, the study depicts how silence resounds with ghostly echoes in solitude, thought can make the identity fractured, doubling becomes a rupture of the self, the phantom uncovers hidden traumas and inherited secrets, and the death drive takes form as compulsive repetition which haunts the mind. These elements reframe the novel’s horror as uncanny. The findings suggest that through a Roylean perspective on the uncanny, Shelley’s Frankenstein transcends traditional Gothic boundaries by dramatizing the instability of the self and the persistence of what cannot be fully known or repressed. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| The Uncanny؛ Nicholas Royle؛ Frankenstein؛ Mary Shelley؛ Characterization | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Bennett, Andrew and Nicholas Royle. An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory. New York, Routledge, 2023.
Bhandari, Sabindra Raj. “The Projection of the Double in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Pursuits: A Journal of English Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2022, pp. 102-109.
Bolton, Gillie. “Frankenstein by Mary Shelley.” Medicine and Literature: The Doctor’s Companion to the Classics, edited by John Salinsky, Abingdon, Radcliffe Medical Press, 2002, pp. 35-51.
Botting, Fred. Gothic. London, Routledge, 1996.
Coates, Paul. The Double and the Other. London, The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1988.
Freud, Sigmund. “The Uncanny.” Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XVII, translated by James Strachey, The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, London, 1955, pp. 219-56.
Gamer, Michael. “Gothic Literature.” Mary Wollstonecraft in Context, edited by Nancy E. Johnson and Paul Keen, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2020, pp. 289-96.
Hunter, J. Paul. “Introduction.” Frankenstein (Norton Critical Editions), edited by J. Paul Hunter, New York, W. W. Norton & Company, 2012, pp. ix-xviii.
Higgins, David. Frankenstein: Character Studies. London, Bloomsbury Academic, 2008.
Islam, Sazia. Mutations of Grief: Pathological Loss and the Psychoanalytic Journey in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. 2024. City University of New York, Thesis.
O’ Flinn, Paul. “Production and Reproduction: The Case of Frankenstein.” Popular Fictions, edited by Peter Humm et al. New York, Routledge, 2013, pp. 196-221.
Petersen, Boyd. “Double Or Phantom?: Transgenerational Haunting in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” The New York Review of Science Fiction, Vol. 17, No. 7, 2005, pp. 16-20.
Rodrigues, Luísa Almeida Alvarez. The Nineteenth-Century Doubles: A Reading of Frankenstein, Wuthering Heights, Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and The Picture of Dorian Gray. 2024. Federal University of Minas Gerais, Thesis.
Royle, Nicholas. The Uncanny. Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2003.
--. In Memory of Jacques Derrida. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
--. “Uncanny Reminiscing: Nicholas Royle in Conversation with Adrien Ordonneau.” Interview by Adrien Ordonneau. Textual Practice, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2025, pp. 673-91.
Schmid, Thomas. “Addiction and isolation in Frankenstein: A Case of Terminal Uniqueness.” Gothic Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2009, pp. 19-29.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, edited by Maurice Hindle, London, Penguin Classics, 1992; Revised Edition, 2003.
Vine, Steven. “Filthy Types: Frankenstein, Figuration, Femininity.” Critical Survey, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1996, pp. 246-58.
Wills, David. “Speculative Fiction: What Nicholas Royle Will Have Written in David Bowie, Enid Blyton and the Sun Machine, Which I Haven’t Read.” Textual Practice, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2025. pp. 653-56. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 102 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 43 |
||