| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 427 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,065 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,528,530 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,713,100 |
مقایسه ویژگیهای روانسنجی سؤالات تشریحی و چندگزینهای در دروس ریاضی و علوم پایه ششم آموزش ابتدایی، بر اساس تئوریهای کلاسیک و سؤال-پاسخ | ||
| تدریس پژوهی | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 13، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 43، دی 1404، صفحه 68-93 اصل مقاله (1.47 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/trj.2025.142154.2067 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| افشین افضلی* ؛ ابوالقاسم یعقوبی؛ محمدعارف پیله ورپور؛ کژال عزیزی؛ دریا قانعی | ||
| گروه روانشناسی ، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه بو علی سینا | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف:این پژوهش با هدف تحلیل و مقایسه ویژگیهای روانسنجی سؤالات تشریحی و چندگزینهای در دروس ریاضی و علوم پایه ششم ابتدایی بر اساس تئوری کلاسیک آزمون و تئوری سؤال–پاسخ انجام شد. روش: پژوهش با روش توصیفی و بر روی ۳۸۸ دانشآموز پایه ششم ابتدایی شهر همدان که بهصورت تصادفی خوشهای انتخاب شدند، انجام شد. دادهها از طریق دو آزمون معلمساخته علوم و ریاضی (شامل سؤالات تشریحی و چندگزینهای) گردآوری و بر اساس تئوری کلاسیک آزمون و تئوری سؤال–پاسخ با استفاده از افزونه e-IRT تحلیل شدند. یافته ها:نتایج نشان داد سؤالات تشریحی در هر دو درس ریاضی و علوم نسبت به سؤالات چندگزینهای عملکرد بهتری دارند. میانگین ضریب تمیز در سؤالات تشریحی برای درس علوم 208/0و برای درس ریاضی 55/0و میانگین ضریب دشواری بهترتیب 591/2 و 342/2هدست آمد. این یافتهها حاکی از آن است که سؤالات تشریحی در سنجش و تمایز توانایی دانشآموزان اثربخشتر عمل میکنند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ویژگی های روانسنجی؛ تئوری کلاسیک؛ تئوری سوال_پاسخ؛ ضریب تمییز؛ ضریب آستانه | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adegoke, B.A. (2013). Comparison of Item Statistics of Physics Achievement Test using Classical Test and Item Response Theory Frameworks. Journal of Education and Practice, 4, 87-96. Ado Abdu Bichi , Rohaya Talib .2018. Item Response Theory: An Introduction to Latent Trait Models to Test and Item Development. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)،Vol.7, No.2, pp. 142~151 Adu-Mensah, J., & Adom, D. (2020). Test, measurement, and evaluation: Understanding and use of the concepts in education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. Ahmadi, H., Shirbagi, N., & Shirbagi, S. (2023). Teachers’ Understanding and Use Of Authentic Assessment In the Teaching-Learning Process. Journal of Research in Teaching, 11(4), 170-197. [In Persian] Alimirzaei.M, Moghadamzadeh. A , Minaei. A, Eizanlou. B , & Salehi. K. (2019). Sources of the Differential Item Functioning and its Application in Education. Journal of Research in Teaching, 7(1), 133-153. [In Persian] Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Ayanwale, Musa Adekunle, Adeleke, J. O., & Mamadelo, T. I. (2019). Invariance Person Estimate of Basic Education Certificate Examination: Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Scoring Perspective. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 23(1), 18–26. Ayenew Takele Alemu , Hiwot Tesfa, Addisu Mulugeta,Enyew Tale Fenta, Mahider Awoke Belay.(2024). Quality of multiple choice question items: item analysis, International Journal of Scientific Reports 10(6):195-199 Babatunde K Oladele, Benson A. Adegoke2020 Using Test Theories Models to Assess Senior Secondary Students Ability in Constructed-Response Mathematics Tests .Journal of Education and Practice . Vol.11, No.7, Baker, F. (2001), The Basics of Item Response Theory, ERIC: Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Bichi, A. A. (2016). Classical test theory: An introduction to linear modelling approach to test and item analysis. International Journal for Social Studies, 2(9), 27-33 Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013). Assessing student learning in higher education. Routledge. Butakor P.K. (2022). Using Classical Test and Item Response Theories to Evaluate Psychometric Quality of Teacher-Made Test in Ghana. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 18, (1), 139
Cai, L., Choi, K., Hansen, M., & Harrell, L. (2016). Item Response Theory. In Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application (Vol. 3, pp. 297–321). Annual Reviews Inc. Chukwu Ohiri .S .(2023) . Psychometric Analysis at Item Level of the Waec May/June Mathematics Multiple Choice Questions Using the Classical Test Theory . International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews , 4(11) , 132-138 Clarke, M. (2011). Framework for building an effective student assessment system: READ/SABER Working Paper. World Bank. Cobbinah, A. & Ntumi, S. (2022). Difficulty, discrimination and pseudo-guessing indices of the West African Examinations Council core mathematics multiple choice items: Practical implications of using item response theory. Journal Research in Education Sciences, 13(5), 51-60 Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2006). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Cengage Learning. Ebrahimi Manesh, M. R., Daneshpoor, A., Hasani Panah, T., & Haji Ramazani, E. (2024). Examination of student evaluation methods throughout the academic year. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences, 5 (53), 627-636. [In Persian] Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2013). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah. 1–371 Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2013). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah. 1–371. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2013). Item response theory. Psychology Press. Ganglmair, A., & Lawson, R. (2010). Advantages of Rasch modelling for the development of a scale to measure affective response to consumption. In EEuropean Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 162–167. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013). Assessing student learning in higher education. Habibi, M., Khodaei, E., & Ezzanlou, B. (2012). *Old and new measurement theories in behavioral and medical sciences: A review of methodology, advantages, and challenges*. Quarterly Journal of Behavioral Sciences Research, 10(4), 302-315. [In Persian] Hambleton, R.K. and Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: principles and applications. p.332. Hambleton, R.K. and Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: principles and applications. p.332. Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H. and Rogers, J.H. (1991), Fundamentals of Item Response Theory, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA Jose Manuel Azevedo , Ema P. Oliveira, Patrícia Damas Beites ,(2019), Using Learning Analytics to evaluate the quality of multiple-choice questions. A perspective with Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory, The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology,36(4) , 322-341 Kusumawati, M., & Hadi, S. (2018). An analysis of multiple choice questions (MCQs): Item and test statistics from mathematics assessments in senior high school. Research and Evaluation in Education. Lang, J. W. B., & Tay, L. (2021). The Science and Practice of Item Response Theory in Organizations. In Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 311–338. Maba, W., Perdata, I. B. K., & Astawa, I. N. (2017). Constructing assessment instrument models for teacher’s performance, welfare and education quality. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 88–96. McAlpine, M. (2002), “Design requirements of a databank”, The CAA Centre TLTP Project, Leicestershire Mehta G, Mokhasi V. 2014 .Item analysis of multiple choice questions-an assessment of the assessment tool. Int J Health Sci Res,;4(7):197-202. Mehtap Erguven , Two approaches to psychometric process: Classical test theory and item response theory , (2013), Journal of Education , Vol. 2 No. 2 Moon, J. (2007). Critical Thinking: An Exploration of Theory and Practice (1st ed.). Routledge. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Musa Adekunle Ayanwale , Julia Chere-Masopha and Malebohang C. Morena , (2022), The Classical Test or Item Response Measurement Theory: The Status of the Framework at the Examination Council of Lesotho , International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research , Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 384-406 Quansah, F., Amoako, I., & Ankomah, F., 2019.“Teachers’ test construction skills in Senior High Schools in Ghana: Document Analysis,” International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-8 Race, P. (2014). The lecturer's toolkit: A practical guide to assessment, learning, and teaching Ravela, P., Arregui, P., Valverde, G., Wolfe, R., Ferrer, G., Rizo, F. M., Aylwin, M., & Wolff, L. (2009). The Educational Assessments that Latin America Needs. Washington, DC: PREAL. Rioborue Alexander Oghenerume , & Friday Egberha,2024, Comparative Analysis of Item Statistics of WASSCE and NECO SSCE 2023 Data Processing Multiple Choice Tests Using Item Response Theory, International Journal of Educational Researchers, 15(1): 58-67 Samadieh, H., Tanhayi Roshwanlou, F., Saeedi Rezvani, T., & Talebzadeh Shushtari, L. (2019). *Psychometric properties of the Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale based on classical test theory and item response theory*. Educational Measurement Quarterly. [In Persian] Santoso, A., Pardede, T., Djidu, H., Apino, E., Rafi, I., Rosyada, M. N., & Abd Hamid, H. S. (2022). The effect of scoring correction and model fit on the estimation of ability parameter and person fit on polytomous item response theory. Research and Evaluation in Education, 8(2), 140–151. Seif, A. A. (2016). *Educational Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation* (7th ed., 8th print). Doran Publishing.. [In Persian] Sharifi, H. P., & Sharifi, N. (2013). *Principles of psychometrics and psychological testing*. Tehran: Roshd Publications. [In Persian] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 99 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 72 |
||