اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی سیستمی- سازه گرا بر رابطۀ متقابل زناشویی در همسرهای آشفته

منابع

حمید پور، حسن (1387). اهمیت روش‌شناسی در پژوهش‌های رفتاری-شناختی. بازتاب دانش، 3، 49-56.

رجبی، غلامرضا؛ حیات‌بخش، لیدا؛ تقی پور، منوچهر (1394). الگوی ساختاری رابطۀ مهارتمندی هیجانی، صمیمیت، رضایت و سازگاری زناشویی. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی و مشاوره خانواده، 5 (16): 67-91.

نظری، علی‌محمد؛ طاهری راد، محسن؛ اسدی، محسن (1392). تأثیر برنامه غنی‌سازی ارتباط بر سازگاری زناشویی همسرها. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی و مشاوره خانواده، 3 (4): 527-542.

هالفورد، کیم (2001). زوج‌درمانی کوتاه‌مدت. ترجمۀ تبریزی، مصطفی؛ کاردانی، مژده؛ جعفری، فروغ (1384). تهران: انتشارات فرا روان.

Ahmad, S. (2012). Enhancing the quality of South Asian Marriages through Systemic-Constructivist Couple Therapy(SCCT): Investigating the role of Couple Identity in Marital Satisfaction. Dissertation submitted for Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada.

Andouz, Z., Dolatshahi, B., Moshtagh, N., & Dadkhah, A. (2012). The efficacy of metacognitive therapy on patients suffering from pure obsession. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 7, 1, 11-21.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self-scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.

Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., & Lewandowski, G. (2002), Shared participation in self-expanding activities: Positive effects on experienced marital quality. In P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds). Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 177-194), New York: Cambridge University Press.

Baddeley, J. L., Berry, M., & Singer, J. A. (2013). Mutuality and Marital Adjustment, Well-Being, and Health in Military Couples. The Military Psychologist, 29, 1, 19-25.

Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 295–318.

Cavaliere, C. (2008). Listening to Understand as a Therapeutic Strategy for Enhancing Interpersonal Processing in an Intimate Relationship. York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Collins, N. L. & Feeney, B. C. (2004). An attachment theory perspective on closeness and intimacy: Normative processes and individual differences. In D. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy (pp. 163-187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dalton, J. (2005). Increasing marital satisfaction in clinically distressed couples: The role of empathic accuracy and “we-ness.” Doctoral dissertation, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Doell. F. k. (2010). Enhancing couples' communication through Systemic-Constructivist Couple Therapy: The relationship between marital listening and relationship quality. Dissertation submitted for Doctorate in philosophy. York University. Canada.

Eisen, S. V., Ranganathan, G., Seal, P., & Spiro III, A. (2007). Measuring clinically meaningful change following mental health treatment. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 34 (3), 272-289.

Genero, N. P., Miller, J. B., Surrey, J., & Baldwin, L. M. (1992). Measuring perceived mutuality in close relationships: Validation of the mutual psychological development questionnaire. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 36-48.

Gottman, J. M. (1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of family psychology, 7 (1), 57-75.

Ingram, R. E., Scott, W. D., & Hayes, A. (2000). Empirically supported treatments: A critical analysis. In C. R. Snyder & Q. R. E. Ingram (Eds.), handbook of psychological change (pp. 40-60). New York: Wiley.

Jacobson, N. S., & Christensen, A. (1996). Integrativecouple therapy: Promoting acceptance and change. New York: Norton.

Johanson, B., & Cheristensen, L. (2008). Educational research. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications, 345.

Kendal, P, C., & Grove, W. M. (1988). Normative comparison in outcome theory. Behavioral assessment, 10, 147-158.

Kendall, P. C., Marrs-Garcia, A., Nath, S. R., & Sheldrick, R. C. (1999). Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67 (3), 285.

Kruger, K. (2005). Relationship and relational mutuality as predictors of well-being and six constructs of well-being. A Dissertation Submitted to the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.Tennessee State University. United States of America.

McRae, T. R., Dalgleish, T. L., Johnson, S. M., Burgess-Moser, M., & Killian, K. D. (2014). Emotion regulation and key change events in emotionally focused couple therapy.  Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 13, 1–24.

Miller, S. (2008). Thinking and speaking in the third person: an extraction study of a technique from systemic-constructivist couple therapy. Graduate program in psychology. York University.

Newman, P., H, A & Newman, B, A (2009). Development through life: a psychological approach. Wadsworth engage learning. Nelson thrones Ltd.

Reid, D. W., & McKim, L. (2014). Psychometric Evaluation of the Couples Mutuality Questionnaire: A Measure of Perceived Mutuality. Manuscript in progress for submission. In press.

Reid, D. W., Dalton, J., Laderoute, K., Doell, F., & Nguyen, T. (2006). Therapeutically induced changes in couple identity: The role of 'we-ness' and interpersonal processing in relationship satisfaction. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 121-143.

Reid, D. W., Doell, F., Dalton, J., & Ahmad, S. (2008). Systemic Constructivist Couple Therapy (SCCT): Description of approach, theoretical advances, and published longitudinal evidence. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 45, 4, 477–490.

Skerrett, K. (1998). Couple adjustment to the experience of breast cancer. Family Systems and Health, 16, 281–298.

Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 15-28.

Stewart, W. (2005). An A-Z of Counseling Theory and Practice (4 th Ed). Nelson thorns LTD.

Zhan, S., & Ottenbacher, K. J. (2001). Single subject research designs for disability research. Disability & Rehabilitation, 23, 1-8.