data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12368/12368c57a9275f81d5fb4177f1912178ebc2e0a9" alt="سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه کردستان"
تعداد نشریات | 31 |
تعداد شمارهها | 334 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,274 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,073,635 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,879,401 |
بررسی اثربخشی الگوی تدریس چرخهای ۹مرحلهای (9E) در تدریس علوم بر درک مفهومی و انگیزش تحصیلی دانشآموزان | ||
تدریس پژوهی | ||
مقاله 7، دوره 10، شماره 3، مهر 1401، صفحه 196-174 اصل مقاله (1.45 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://www.doi.org/10.34785/J012.2022.041 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
حورا صدرائی* 1؛ شهرام واحدی2؛ رحیم بدری گرگری2؛ اسکندر فتحی آذر2 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، آذربایجان شرقی، ایران. | ||
2استاد روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، آذربایجان شرقی، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف پژوهش حاضر، تعیین اثربخشی الگوی تدریس چرخهای۹مرحلهای (9E) در تدریس علوم بر درک مفهومی و انگیزش تحصیلی بوده است. روش پژوهش از نوع نیمه آزمایشی بود که در اجرای آن از طرح پیشآزمون-پسآزمون با گروه کنترل استفاده شد. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه دانشآموزان پسر پایه پنجم ابتدایی استان آذربایجان غربی؛ شهرستان خوی در سال تحصیلی 1401-1400 بود که از بین آنها60دانشآموز به روش نمونهگیری خوشهای انتخاب شد و در دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل گمارده شدند. ابزارهای پژوهش شامل آزمون درک مفهومی معلم ساخته و پرسشنامه انگیزش تحصیلی هارتر بود که همهی آزمودنیهای گروه آزمایش و کنترل، قبل و بعد از آموزش با استفاده از آزمون درک مفهومی معلم ساخته و پرسشنامه انگیزش تحصیلی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. آزمودنیهای گروه آزمایش به مدت دوازده جلسه تدریس 45دقیقهای الگوی تدریس چرخهای ۹مرحلهای (9E) در درس علوم را دریافت کردند. گروه کنترل نیز همزمان روش تدریس سنتی (معمول) را دریافت کردند. تجزیهوتحلیل دادهها با روشها و تکنیکهای آماری توصیفی و استنباطی مختلف ازجمله روشهای آماری میانگین، انحراف استاندارد، تحلیل کواریانس و با استفاده از نرمافزار Spss26 انجام شد. یافتهها نشانگر تأثیر مثبت الگوی تدریس چرخهای ۹مرحلهای (9E) بر درک مفهومی و انگیزش تحصیلی دانشآموزان بود که منجر به بهبود معنیدار درک مفهومی و انگیزش تحصیلی گروه آزمایش در مقایسه با گروه کنترل شده است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
الگوی تدریس چرخهای؛ درک مفهومی؛ انگیزش تحصیلی | ||
مراجع | ||
Abdi, A., & Safari, I. (2018). “The effectiveness of education based on the seven-stage learning cycle model (7E) on the motivation to learn in experimental sciences”. Scientific Quarterly Research Journal, 14(58), 94-71. Akar, E. (2005). Effectiveness of 5E learning model on students’ understanding of acid-base concepts. Unpublished master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey Allen, P., & Bennett, K. (2008). SPSS for the health & behavioural sciences. Thomson. Ameri, M. (2021). Analysis of the methods of teaching and teaching experimental science courses in elementary school, the fourth international conference of psychology, educational sciences and social studies, Hamedan. Andini, T. E., Hidayat, S., Fadillah, E. N., & Permana, T. I. (2018). Scientific process skills: Preliminary study towards senior high school student in Palembang. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(3), 243-250. Anisah, F., & Syukri, M. (2020). The effectiveness of 7E learning cycle model to improve student motivation in work and energy topic. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1460)1( p. 012136. IOP Publishing. Bahrani, M. (2009). The study of validity and reliability of Harter’s Scale of Educational Motivation. Journal of Psychological Studies, 5(1), 51-72. Bani Ardalan, Sh. (2016). The effect of educational design based on the seven-stage learning cycle model on the academic progress and improvement of creativity of sixth grade elementary students. Master's thesis, Payam Noor University, Kermanshah branch Beyene, K. M., & Yimam, J. A. (2016).Multilevel analysis for identifying factors influencing academic achievement of students in higher education institution: the case of Wollo University. Journal of Education and Practice, 7 (13): 17-23. Cakır, N.K. (2017). Effect of 5E Learning Model on academic achievement,attitudeandscience processskills:Metaـanalysisstudy.Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(11), 157-170. Clark, M. H., & Schroth, C. A. (2018). Examining relationships between academic motivation and personality among college students. Learning and individual differences, 20(1), 19-24. Correiro, E. E., Griffin, L. R., & Hart, P. E. (2008). A constructivist approach to inquiry-based learning: A TUNEL assay for the detection of apoptosis in cheek cells. American Biology Teacher, 70 (8), 457-460. Dehghan Manshadi, M., Bavieh Soltanzade, S., & Hemati, H. (2021). Designing a Pattern for Educational Motivation Growth in Elementary School Students According to the Grounded Theory. Eynipour, J., Rezazadeh, A., & Hashemi, N. (2019). Predicting academic motivation based on individual factors (case study: Amin University of Police Sciences). Scientific Journal of Law Education, 7(27), 417-456. Froiland, J. M., & Oros, E. (2014). Intrinsic motivation, perceived competence and classroom engagement as longitudinal predictors of adolescent reading achievement. Educ. Psychol. 34, 119–132. Garcia I Grau, F., Valls, C., Piqué, N., & Ruiz-Martín, H. (2021). The long-term effects of introducing the 5E model of instruction on students’ conceptual learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1441-1458. George, R. (2006). A cross‐domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes toward science and attitudes about the utility of science. International journal of science education, 28(6), 571-589. Habibi, H., Mahmoudi, F., Khodayari Shawti, S., & Babazadeh Hassoni, Z. (2019). Investigating the effectiveness of the implementation of the "School Smarting Plan" and its relationship with the learning-oriented atmosphere, Journal of Education Research, 6(21), 47-64. Habibi, K. R., & Bahadori, K. J. (2019). The ettect of innovative teaching model and learning based on 7E model with improve creative thinking students. Henry, A., & Thorsen, C. (2018). Teacher–student relationships and L2 motivation. Mod. Lang. J. 102, 218–241. Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300-1323. Jahdi, R. (2017). The effect of Bayabi educational design model (5E) on critical thinking and creativity of sixth grade students. Master's thesis in the field of educational psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Tabriz University. Karpudewan, M., Zain, A. N. M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2017). Overcoming Students' Misconceptions in Science. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Limited Kaur, P., & Gakhar, A. (2014). 9E model and e-learning methodologies for the optimisation of teaching and learning. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE) 42-347. Kazemi Fard, D., Mikaili Mani, F., & Isa-Zadegan, A. (2018). Investigating the relationship between scientific epistemological beliefs, motivation and self-efficacy of learning science with the concepts of learning science among students of basic sciences at Urmia University. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 7(13), 21-48. Khalq Elah, M. (2013). Comparison of the effect of education based on multiple intelligences and the conventional method on the learning of science lessons of 7-8 years old female students of primary schools in Shiraz in the academic year of 2013-2014. Master's thesis. Islamic Azad university. Arsanjan unit. Kiamanesh, A. R. (2006). The role of students’ characteristics a family background in Iranian student’s mathematics achievement.Contexts of learning mathematics and sciences, lessons learned from TIMSS. London & New York Routhedge. Kiamanesh, A. R., & Mearaji, S. (2011). Study the relationship between science self-concept, attitudes toward sciences and importance of science on academic performance of 8th grade students in Iran and Sweeden. New Educational Approaches, 6(2), 23-40. Komikesari, H., Anggraini, W., Asiah, N., Dewi, P.S., Diani, R., & Yulianto, M.N. (2020). Effect size test of 7e learning cycle model: conceptual understanding and science process skills on senior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1572. Koniceck-Moran, R., & Keeley, P. (2015). Teaching for conceptual understanding in science. NSTA Press: Arlington. Marfilinda, R., Rossa, R., Jendriadi, J., & Apfani, S. (2020). The Effect of 7E Learning Cycle Model toward Students' Learning Outcome of Basic Science Concept. Journal of teaching and learning in elementary education (JTLEE), 3(1), 77-87. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands Maskur, R., Latifah, S., Pricilia, A., Walid, A., & Ravanis, K. (2019). The 7E learning cycle approach to understand thermal phenomena. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8 (4), 464-474. Miles, J., & Banyard, P. (2007). Understanding and Using Statistics in Psychology: A Practical Introduction. London: SAGE Moradian, B. (2017). The effect of the learning cycle based on the structuralist approach on academic success and attitude towards mathematics in sixth grade students of Helilan district. Master's thesis, field of educational sciences, Payam Noor University, Kermanshah Center Mubarokah, F. A., & Nasrudin, H. (2020). Improvement of Self-Efficacy and Student Learning Outcomes on Acid Base Material Using 9E Learning Cycle Model. In International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering (IJCSE 2020) (pp. 199-202). Atlantis Press. Myers III, R. E., & Fouts, J. T. (1992). A cluster analysis of high school science classroom environments and attitude toward science. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 29(9), 929-937. Nademi, M., Mohammadi-Aria, A., & Khoini, S. (2021). The causal model of the relationship between social environment perception and academic motivation with the mediating role of academic expectations, documentary styles, and academic emotions, Children's Mental Health Quarterly, 8(3), 102-118. Naemi, A.M., Karimi, A., & Faqihi, S. (2019). The effect of teaching learning cycle model based on constructivist approach on academic motivation and creativity of seventh grade female students, Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 8(14), 163-186. Nugent, T. T. (2019). The impact of teacher-student interaction on student motivation and achievement. University of Central Florida. Palmer, D. H. (2009). “Students’ interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 147-165. Rakhman, P. A., Suryadi, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2019). Mathematical communication of junior high student based on the conceptual understanding of triangle. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1157) 4), p. 042115. IOP Publishing. Rayan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Classic definetions and new directions: Contemporary Education al Psycholog, 25, 54-67. Reiff, R., Harwood, W. S., & Phillipson, T. (2002). A Scientific Method Based upon Research Scientists' Conceptions of Scientific Inquiry. Riveiro, J. M. S., Suarez, A. P. F., Sanchez, V. R., & Menendez, A. Z. (2016). Incidencia de las estrategias motivacionales de valor sobre las estrategias cognitivas y metacognitivas en estudiantes de secundaria. Rev. Complut. Educ, 27, 421–435. Sarac, H. (2018). The effect of learning cycle models on achievement of students: A meta analysis study. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4 (1), 1- 18. Shafii Sarostani, M., & Daraei Emarati, A. (2021). Constructivist curriculum design and its effect on the academic performance of sixth grade students in experimental sciences. Educational Research Quarterly of Farhangian University, 7(27), 27-49. Shafiee, N., Behroozi, N., Shehni Yailagh, M., & Abolghasemi, M. (2019). The causal relationship between perception of constructive learning environment and Individual systemic thinking with tendency to lifelong learning, mediated by intrinsic motivation in undergraduate students of Shahid Chamran University of ahvaz. Journal of Educational Scinces, 25(2), 109-130. Shirzadi, M., & SHeykholeslami, R. (2021). Ethical manners of education: the mediating role of academic conflict in the relationship between academic motivation and academic avoidance. The Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 16(1), 51-59. Slavin, R. (2006). Educational psychology (8th edition). Translated by Seyed Mohammadi, Yahya (1387), Tehran: Rawan Publishing House. Ugulu, I. (2020). Gifted students’ attitudes towards science. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 28(1-3), 7-14. Uulgan, M. A., & Akkuzu, N. (2014). A look at the academic intrinsic motivations of teacher candidates. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 14(1), 7-32. Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). An overview of conceptual understanding in science education curriculum in Indonesia. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 1-7. Yadigaroglu, M., & Demircioglu, G. (2012). The effect of activities based on 5e model on grade 10 students’ understanding of the gas concept. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 634-637. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 809 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 538 |