پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 29 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 289 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,807 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,282,974 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,361,687 |
Social Cohesion and Cultural Diversity in Contemporary Britain: Impossible Mission! | ||
| Critical Literary Studies | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 1، شماره 2، آذر 2019، صفحه 31-56 اصل مقاله (843.9 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.34785/J014.2019.484 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Hassen Zriba* | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Gafsa, Gafsa, Tunisia | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In contemporary multicultural Britain, the concept of social cohesion has been a pressing priority for not only politicians and sociologists but also for the various British ethnic minorities. Race riots like those of 2001 in Northern Britain and the events of 7/7 in London (2005) put into question the allegiances of different British ethnic populations. They equally shed light on the real or perceived lack of social and cultural communication between the established British host population and the British ethnic and immigrant communities. Hence, social cohesion came to the fore as the new jargon of governance in contemporary Britain. This article analyzes on the concept of social cohesion and its applicability within an officially declared multicultural community like that of Great Britain. The concept will be reviewed, defined and approached from different liberal political perspectives while paying special attention to the British context. Bhikhu Parekh’s conception of the different theoretical approaches to the issue of social cohesion that are pertinent to liberal capitalist societies in general and the British context, in particular, is investigated. The aim of this study is to highlight the complexity of the normative accounts of the political scientists regarding the challenges that face multicultural Britain in coming to terms with its endeavor of creating “unity within diversity”. The 2002 White Paper and security speech of David Cameron (2011) political discourses are analyzed and evaluated to decipher how they understood national identity in relation to cultural diversity and social cohesion. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Social Cohesion؛ Diversity؛ British Ethnic Minorities؛ Race؛ Community | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Bernard, P. “Social Cohesion: A Dialectical Critique of a Quasi-Concept?” SRA. Strategic Research and Analysis, Bernard, Paul (Trans) No. 41, 2000, pp. 47-59.
Blunkett, D. Secure Borders, Safe Haven. London: White Paper, 2002.
Bollen, K and Hoyele, R. “Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination.” Social Forces, Vol. 69, No. 2, 1990, pp. 479-504.
Brown, C. “If we want social cohesion we need a sense of identity.” Sunday, 9 December, 2001.
Cameron, D. “PM’s Speech at Munich Security Conference.” 2011, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pms-speech-at-munich-security-conference, [Accessed on 30 May 2016].
Cantle, T. Community Cohesion: A Report of the Independent Review Team, London: Home Office, 2001.
Clarke, T. Report of the Burnley Task Force. Burnley: Burnley Local Council, 2002.
Comte, A. Auguste Comte: The Foundation of Sociology, Michigan: Nelson Edition, 1976.
Dahl, R. A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.
Denham, J. Building Cohesive Communities: A Report of the Ministerial Group on Public Order and Community Cohesion, London: Home Office, 2002.
Dunleavy, P. “Alternative Theories of Liberal Democratic Politics: The Pluralist-Marxist Debate in the 1980’s.” in Society and Social Sciences, Potter, D. et al., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1981.
Durkeim, E. The Division of Labour in Society, Free Press: New York, 1964.
Eisenber, A. “Pluralism, Consociationalism, Group-Differentiated Citizenship and the Problem of Social Cohesion.” 2002, http://www2.arts.ubc.ca/cresp/plurpap.pdf [Accessed on 10 January 2008]
Gordon, P. “A Dirty War: The New Right and Local Authority Anti-Racism”, in Ball, W. and Solomos, J. Race and Local Politics, London: Macmillan, 1990.
Jenson, J. Mapping Social Cohesion: The State of Canadian Research,Ottawa: Renouf Publishing Co. Ltd, 1998.
Kundnani, A. ()“From Oldham to Bradford: The Violence of the Violated.” Race and Class, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2001, pp. 105-131.
Kundnani, A “The Death of Multiculturalism.” 2002, http://www.irr.org.uk/news/the-death-of-multiculturalism [Accessed on 12 April 2016].
Kymlicka, W. Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1989.
Kymlicka, W. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Lester, A. “From Legislation to Integration.” in Race Relations in Britain: a developing agenda, Blackstone, T., Parekh, B. and Sanders, P., London: Routledge, 1998.
Lijphart, A. “Cultural Diversity and Political Integration.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. IV, No. 1, 1971, pp. 1-14.
Lijphart, A. () “Constitutional Design for Divided Societies”, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2004, pp. 96-109.
Lijphart, A. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1977.
Malik, K. “The Trouble with Multiculturalism.” Spiked-Politics Online,2001, (http://www.spiked-online.com/articles/00000002D35E.htm) [Accessed on 2 June 2008].
Malik, K. “Against Multiculturalism.” New Humanist, 2002, (http://www.kenanmalik.com/essays/against_mc.html). [Accessed on 15 October 2008].
Malik, K.“Multiculturalism and the Road to Terror”, handelsblatt, 3 January 2006, (http://www.kenanmalik.com/essays/muslims_handelsblatt.html) [Accessed on 20 November 2008].
Mann, M. “The Social Cohesion of Liberal democracy.” in Society and Social Sciences, Potter, D. et al., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1981.
Mizruchi, M. The Structure of Corporate Political Action. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Moody, J. and White, D. “Structural Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Concept of Social Groups.” American Sociological Review, Vol. 68, No. 1. 2003, pp. 103-127.
Ouseley, H. Community Pride not prejudice, Bradford: Bradford Vision, 2001.
Parekh, B. “Defining British national identity.” Political Quarterly, No. 71, 2000, pp. 4-14.
The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain, Parekh, B. (Ed), London: The Runnymede Trust, 2000c.
Parsons, T. The System of Modern Societies, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1971.
Pilkington, A. Racial Disadvantage and Ethnic Diversity in Britain, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Ritchie, D. Oldham Independent Review, Oldham: Oldham Local Council, 2001.
Shils, E. “Center and periphery” in Potter, D et al. in Society and Social Sciences, Potter, D. et al., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1981.
Stanley, D. (2003) “What Do We Know about Social Cohesion: The Research Perspective of the Federal Government’s Social Cohesion Research Network.” Canadian Journal of Sociology, Vol.28, No. 1, Special Issue on Social Cohesion in Canada, 2003, pp. 5-17.
Weber, M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, New York: Free Press, 1997.
Worley, C. “‘It’s not about race. It’s about the community’: New Labour and ‘community cohesion.’” Critical Social,Vol. 25, No. 4, 2005, pp. 483-496.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2004) “Borders, Boundaries and the Politics of belonging” in Ethnicity, Nationalism and Minority Rights, May, S., Modood T., and Squires, J., London: Cambridge University Press.
Zriba, H. “Representation of “Ethnic Residential Segregation” in British Post-2001 Race Riots National Reports.” European Journal of Academic Essays, Vol. 1, No. 32014, pp. 20-27.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 763 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 532 |
||
