پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 289 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,820 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,303,120 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,375,582 |
Villain-Becoming and Body without Organs: A Deleuze-Guattarian Rhizoanalysis of Paul Auster’s Invisible | ||
| Critical Literary Studies | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 3، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 5، خرداد 2021، صفحه 55-67 اصل مقاله (827.07 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.34785/J014.2021.530 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Moein Moradi1؛ Nasser Maleki* 2 | ||
| 1MA in English Language and Literature, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran | ||
| 2English department, faculty of art & humanities, Razi Universality Kermanshah | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The present paper seeks to argue that the opposing roles Paul Auster has devised for his protagonists in Invisible (2010) evolve around metamorphosic changes in their behaviors in terms of Deleuze and Guattari’s rhizome theory. While the protagonist undertakes a Deleuzian Bocoming to be a villain, the antagonist possesses a radical form of a Body without Organ. This study thus defines its main assignment to find the relevant Deleuze-Guattarian flickers within the novel. Deleuze and Guattari launch their notions of Becoming and BwO within their theory of Rhizome. To substantiate this, six principles of the rhizomatic expansion (including connection, heterogeneity, multiplicity, a signifying rupture, cartography, and decalcomania) are examined vis-à-visInvisible. The story’s main characters would thus exhibit their rhizomatic and nomadic inclinations while the novel’s narration and setting would add to the multiplicitous dimension of the story. Ultimately, through such rhizomatic praxis, this paper identifies radical de-territorialization – or breaking free from social norms – as a major Austrian technique to portray the predicaments of contemporary American lifestyle. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Deleuze؛ Guattari؛ Rhizome؛ de-territorialization؛ Paul Auster؛ Invisible | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Auster, Paul. Invisible. London: Faber and Faber Ltd, 2010.
Bressler, Charles E. Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. London: Pearson Longman, 2012.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari Félix. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.
Goodchild, Phillip. “Philosophy as a Way of Life: Deleuze on Thinking and Money.” SubStance, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2010, pp. 24-37. DOI:10.1353/sub.0.0075.
Eco, Umberto. Reflections on the Name of the Rose. London: Secker and Warburg, 1985.
Kovačević, Darko. “Postmodern Narrative Strategies in Paul Auster’s Novels Man in the Dark and Invisible.” First International Conference on Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, May 5-7 2011, Sarajevo.
Lawlor, Leonard. "Following the Rats: Becoming-Animal in Deleuze and Guattari." SubStance, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2008, pp. 169-187. DOI:10.1353/sub.0.0016.
Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.
Semetsky, Inna. “Silent Discourse: The Language of Signs and ‘Becoming-Woman.’” SubStance, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2010, pp. 87-102.
Shostak, Debra. “In the Country of Missing Persons: Paul Auster’s Narratives of Trauma.” Studies in the Novel, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2009, pp. 66-87. DOI:10.1353/sdn.0.0053
Trifonova, Temenuga. “A Nonhuman Eye: Deleuze on Cinema.” SubStance, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2004, pp. 134-152. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 570 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 365 |
||
