پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 289 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,820 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,303,987 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,376,113 |
Language Kingdom in William Shakespeare’s King Learand Edward Bond’s Lear | ||
| Critical Literary Studies | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 1، شماره 2، آذر 2019، صفحه 185-205 اصل مقاله (776.07 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.34785/J014.2019.445 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Fatemeh Mahmoudi-Tazehkand* | ||
| Islamic Azad University. Dehloran Branch | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This paper aims to investigate the role of language as a form of political and social control, and a vehicle for power and domination in Shakespeare’s King Lear and Edward Bond’s Lear on parallel bases. Foucault’s famous statement which refers to power as present “everywhere, not because it embraces everything but because it comes from everywhere” clearly points to the always already presence of power. The issue of power has occupied a central position within his works. In fact, language can reflect truth as false and vice versa to sustain dominant group’s desires. Language can both reflect and affect our perception of the world indeed. In fact, King Lear and Lear are both stages for language game. The paper thus aims to focus on the way language plays a key role in King Lear and Lear as a vehicle for power and how language makes you powerful or how it throws you away to be a margin. The result shows that there is a dual relation between language and power, so that the voice of king is doomed to silence through the function of characters’ powerful language usage. In both plays, King is in the margin and language rules powerfully on socio-political relations. This paper has benefited from library documents and sources by use of a descriptive-analytical method. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Language؛ Power؛ Power Relations؛ Foucault؛ King Lear؛ Lear | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Bagshaw, D. “Language, power and mediation.” Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2003, pp. 130-141.
Bond, E. Lear. London: Eyre Methuen, 1972
Booker, M. K. A Practical Introduction to Literary Theory and Criticism. New York: Longman Publishers: USA, 1996.
Cameron, D et al. Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. London and New York: Routledge, 1992.
Foucault, M. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge, 1997.
Letherby, G. Feminist Research in Theory and Practice. London: Biddles Ltd. 2003.
Shakespeare, W. King Lear. Montreal: Montreal Press, 1969.
Skura, M. “Dragon Fathers and Unnatural Children: Warring Generations in King Lear and Its Sources.” Comparative Drama: Vol. 42, No. 2, 2008, pp. 121-148.
Smart, B. Michel Foucault. London and New York: Routledge, 1985.
Strathern, P. The Essential Foucault. London: Virgin Books Ltd., 2002.
Thomas, L. et al. (Eds.). Language, Society and Power. London and New York: Routledge, 1999.
Wheatley, E. “Voices of Violence: Medieval French Farce and the Dover Cliff Scene in King Lear.” Comparative Drama, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2009, pp. 455-471. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 366 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 186 |
||
