پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 289 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,818 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,298,353 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,371,817 |
The Efficacy of Two Teaching Methods on Minimizing the Grammatical Errors in Translating Persian Sentences into English | ||
| Critical Literary Studies | ||
| مقاله 14، دوره 3، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 6، آذر 2021، صفحه 191-210 اصل مقاله (1.03 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.34785/J014.2021.686 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mostafa Bahraman* 1؛ Roya Movahed2 | ||
| 1Kashmar Higher Education Institute, Kashmar, Iran | ||
| 2Kashmar Higher Education Institute, Kashmar, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study deals with spotting the grammatical errors committed by the Iranian students majoring in English translation while translating the Persian sentences into English and investigating the effect of two teaching methods, including Grammar-Translation Method (GTM) and Communicative Language Teaching Method (CLT), on minimizing these errors. For this purpose, the grammatical errors in the translation of thirty students were identified. These errors were analyzed and classified according to Keshavarz’s model of error analysis. The students were divided into two groups; the first group received the learning materials based on GTM, and in the second group CLT was applied. Afterward, a test which included English sentences extracted from Modern English 1 and 2 was designed based on the errors taken from the corpus compiled by the students’ translations. Then the frequency of the errors in both groups were analyzed by SPSS software to determine the significance of using these methods on minimizing the grammatical errors made by the students in their translations into English. To determine the level of significance, the probability value was calculated for raw errors, GTM and CLT errors. The analysis of Pearson correlation showed that both methods had their significance; however, the communicative method proved to be slightly more effective than the other. Undoubtedly, this does not mean to underestimate the efficacy of grammar translation method since it seems that it plays a complementary role in teaching environment, and achieving better pedagogical results cannot be prescribed on a single method. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Error Analysis؛ Grammatical Errors؛ Grammar-Translation؛ Communicative Language Teaching؛ Translation | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Bond, Francis. Determiners and Number in English Contrasted with Japanese, as Exemplified in Machine Translation. diss. University of Queensland, 2001.
Corder, Stephen. Introducing Applied Linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin Education, 1973.
Crystal, David. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics 6th Edition. Hoboken, New Jerssey: Wiley Blackwell, 2008.
Dulay, Heidi, Marine Burt, and Stephen Krashen. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Frank, Marcella. Modern English, Part of Speech. Prentice Hall, 1972.
---. Modern English, Sentences and Complex Structures. Prentice Hall, 1972.
Haspelmath, Martin, and Andrea D Sims. Understanding Morphology. New York, London: Routledge, 2013.
Heydari, Pooneh, and Mohammad Bagheri. “Error Analysis: Sources of L2 Learners’ Errors.” Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2012.
Ilani, Ali, and Hossein Barati. “Translation of journalist texts in Iranian undergraduate students: An error analysis approach.” International Journal of English Linguistics, Vol. 6, No. 6, 2016, pp. 147–161. doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n6p147
James, Carl. Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. London: Routledge, 1998.
Kaweera, Chittima. “Writing Error: A Review of Interlingual and Intralingual Interference in Efl Context.” English Language Teaching, Vol. 6, No. 7, 2013, pp. 9-18.
Keshavarz, Mohammad Hossein. Error Analysis: A Practical Course for English Students and Teachers. Tehra: SAMT, 2013.
Keshavarz, Mohammad Hossein. Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Tehran: Rahnama Press, 2012.
Khansir, Ali Akbar. “Error Analysis and Second Language Writing.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2013, p. 363.
Kroeger, Paul R. Analyzing Grammar: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Liu, Meihua, and Ying Xu. “An Investigation of Syntactic Errors in Chinese Undergraduate Efl Learners’ Compositions: A Cohort Study.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2013, pp. 182-91.
Meyer, Charles F. Introducing English Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 2009
Mitchell, Rosamond. “The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching.” Teaching modern languages, 1994, pp. 33-42.
Pavey, Emma L. The Structure of Language: An Introduction to Grammatical Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Phuket, Pimpisa Rattanadilok Na, and Normah Binti Othman. “Understanding Efl Students’ Errors in Writing.” Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 6, No. 32, 2015, pp. 99-106.
Presada, Diana, and Mihaela Badea. “The Effectiveness of Error Analysis in Translation Classes. A Pilot Study.” Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, No. 22, 2014, pp. 49-59.
Radford, Andrew, Martin Atkinson, David Britain, Harald Clahsen and Andrew Spencer. Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Richards, Jack C. “A Non-Contrastive Approach to Error Analysis.” Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, 1974, pp. 172-88.
Richards, Jack C, and Theodore S Rodgers. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge university press, 2001.
Runkati, K, and M Chatupote. Organizational Patterns and Common Mistakes in English Research Abstracts. Thesis, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, 2013.
Soltani, Fatemeh, Azadeh Nemati and Mortaza Yamini. ”An Analysis of Translation Errors in 5 Literary genres based on American Translation Association framework.” Cogent Arts & Humanities, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2020.1799732
Trask, Robert Lawrence. Language and Linguistics: The Key Concepts. London: Taylor and Francis, 2007.
Whong, Melinda. Language Teaching: Linguistic Theory in Practice: Linguistic Theory in Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011.
Widdowson, Henry G. “The Linguistic Perspective”. Handbook of Foreign Language Communication and Learning. edited by Karlfried Kanpp and Barbara Seidlhofer, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2009.
Yousofi, Nouroddin. “Describing the Errors in the Translations of Iranian Novice English Translators.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 98, 2014, pp. 1952-1958.
Yule, George. The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Zafar, Ameena. “Error Analysis: A Tool to Improve English Skills of Undergraduate Students.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 217, 2016, pp. 697-705.
Zheng, Cui, and Tae-Ja Park. “An Analysis of Errors in English Writing Made by Chinese and Korean University Students.” Theory & Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 3, No. 8, 2013. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 522 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 399 |
||
