پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 289 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,820 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,302,066 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,374,814 |
Thomas Pynchon’s Southern Californian Literary Heterotopology: Decompression Heterotopias in Inherent Vice | ||
| Critical Literary Studies | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 4، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 7، خرداد 2022، صفحه 41-54 اصل مقاله (857.44 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.34785/J014.2022.253 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Moein Moradi1؛ Amirali Nojoumian* 2 | ||
| 1PhD Candidate of English Literature, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor of English Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Looking back at the early 1970s socio-cultural upheavals, Thomas Pynchon’s Inherent Vice (2009) generates a discursive construct of Los Angeles that captures the transition from a Fordist culture to a Post-Fordist one. This essay holds that around this watershed moment, literary heterotopias specific to Southern California are being made. Michel Foucault defines heterotopias as realized utopias, emplacements that simultaneously represent, contest, and invert the normal space. This study reads Inherent Vice, using Foucault’s archaeological method of analysis to develop literary heterotopology. A discursive analysis of Pynchon’s novel reveals heterotopias’ discontinuous nature, which this study proposes as the seventh principle for heterotopology. Furthermore, Pynchon uses a new vehicle, Decompression Heterotopias, to reshape globalization in his retro-production of Los Angeles. Ultimately, the essay shows how the Fordist and Post-Fordist waves of globalization aspire to affect Angeleno’s lives by compressing the time-space spectrum. Pynchon’s decompression heterotopias, however, resist the status quo and propose reconfiguring globalization’s compression forces. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Thomas Pynchon؛ Inherent Vice؛ Los Angeles؛ Archaeological Analysis؛ Literary Heterotopology | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Anker, Elizabeth S. Fictions of Dignity: Embodying Human Rights in World Literature. London: Cornell UP, 2012. Baneth-Nouailhetas, Emilienne. “Committed Writing, Committed Writer?” Globalizing Dissent: Essays on Arundhati Roy. London: Routledge, 2008. pp. 93-104. Dumitrescu, Alexandra. “Intimations of Metamodernism: Innocence and Experience in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things.” Rites of Passage in Postcolonial Women’s Writing. Edited by Pauline Dodgson-Katiyo and Gina Wisker. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010. pp. 149-66. Eshelman, Raoul. Performatism, or the End of Postmodernism. New York: The Davies Group Publishers, 2008. Esmkhani Yuvalari, Farnaz, et al. “Globalization of Local Lives: Performing Self-Authenticity as Personal, Local and Social Process in Zadie Smith’s NW.” Critical Literary Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, 2021, pp. 141-156. DOI: 10.34785/J014.2021.779 Ferreri, Maria, and Gloria Dawson. “Self -Precarization and the Spatial Imaginaries of Property Guardianship.” Cultural Geographies, vol. 25, no. 3, 2018, pp. 425-440. Genette, Gerard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. New York: Cornell UP, 1980. Gorman-DaRif, Meghan. “Post-Magic: The Female Naxalite at 50 in Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness and Neel Mukherjee’s A State of Freedom.” South Asian Review, vol. 39, no.3-4, 2018, pp. 298-310. Lau, Lisa, and Ana Cristina Mendes. “Romancing the Other: Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness.” The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, Jan. 2019, pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.1177/0021989418820701 Lawn, Jennifer. “Precarity: A Short Literary History, from Colonial Slum to Cosmopolitan Precariat.” Interventions, vol. 19, no. 7, 2017, pp. 1026-40. MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue. London: Duckworth, 1985. Macwan, Sunil S. Literary Cosmopolitanisms of Salman Rushdie, Amitav Ghosh, and Arundhati Roy. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 2018. Menozzi, Filippo. “Too Much Blood for Good Literature: Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness and the Question of Realism.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing, vol. 55, no. 1, 2019, pp. 20-33. Phelan, James. Experiencing Fiction: Judgment, Progressions, and the Rhetorical Theory of Narrative. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2007. ---. Living to Tell About It: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Character Narration. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2007. ---. “Rhetoric/Ethics.” The Cambridge Companion to Narrative. Edited by David Herman. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 2007. 287-306. ---. “Rhetorics, Ethics, and Narrative Communication.” Soundings, vol. 94, no. 1-2, 2011, pp. 55-75. Phelan, James, and Peter J. Rabinowitz. “Twain, Huck, Jim, and US: The Ethics of Progression in Huckleberry Finn.” In Narrative Ethics. Edited by Jakob Lothe and Jeremy Hawthorn. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2013, pp. 153-166. Roy, Arundhati. The Greater Common Good. Bombay: India Book Distributors, 1999. ---. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. London: Penguin Random House: 2017. ---. The Ordinary Person’s Guide to Empire. Cambridge: South End Press, 2004. Taylor, Charles. Ethics of Authenticity. Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1991. ---. Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1995. ---. “Self-interpreting Animals.” In Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers I. Charles Taylor. New York: Cambridge UP, 1985, pp. 45-77. ---. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1989. ---. “The Dialogical Self.” In The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Edited by David R Hiley, et al. Ithaca: Cornell UP: 1991, pp. 304-14. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 487 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 270 |
||
