پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 289 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,820 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,304,141 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,376,181 |
The Levinasian Responsible Subject’s Breaching the Face’s Command: An Inversion of the Master-Slave Relationship in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy | ||
| Critical Literary Studies | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 4، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 7، خرداد 2022، صفحه 55-77 اصل مقاله (918.95 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.34785/J014.2022.400 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Zakarya Bezdoode* 1؛ Negar Monfared Saeed2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor of English Language and Literature, Department of Language and Literature, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
| 2PhD Candidate of English Language and Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In accordance with Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics, the interconnection between the subject and its Other is equated with the master-slave relationship, which is not by any means absolute. This article aims at illustrating an oscillating state of master-and-slave relation with regard to Levinas’s ethics in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy. The Face of the Other becomes a ‘poor master’ who needs help and yet gives a serious order to the subject, one that he should obey. Subsequently, the Other deprives the subject of his/her wealth, thus overcoming its own poverty; therefore, the Other as a ‘poor master’ and the subject as a ‘wealthy subject’ constitute an ethical relationship. Founding the argument on the above-mentioned Levinasian principles, this paper approaches the altruistic intentions of Atwood’s post-apocalyptic characters, and inspects how the post-apocalyptic world of her MaddAddam trilogy is ultimately orientated towards, if not also predicting, a return to now bygone humanistic, ethical and communal society. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Subject؛ Post-Apocalyptic؛ Levinas’s Ethics of the Other؛ Margaret Atwood؛ Utopia | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alecxe, Amber. “The New Face of Citizenship: Uncovering a Radical Notion of Freedom,” Canadian Political Science Association (CPSA), 2007. Retrieved July 23, 2016. http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/conference-press-2007-f.php Anderson, Lindsay McCoy, “The Machine, the Victim, and the Third Thing: Navigating the Gender Spectrum In Margaret Atwood's Oryx And Crake and The Year Of The Flood" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2362. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2362. Atwood, Margaret. The Handmaid’s Tale. Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1986. ---. In Other Worlds: SF and the Human Imagination. New York: Doubleday, 2011. ---. MaddAddam. New York: Anchor Books, 2013. ---. Oryx and Crake. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 2003. ---. The Year of the Flood. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 2009. Burggraeve, Roger. “Violence and the Vulnerable Face of the Other: The Vision of Emmanuel Levinas on Moral Evil and Our Responsibility,” Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 30, 1999, pp. 29-45. Payeras, Lidia María Cuadrado. Apocalypse and Posthumanism in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy: Towards a Comprehensive Theoretical Approach. Diss. Salamanca University: Spain, 2017. Edelglass, William, James Hatley and Christian Diehm. (Eds.) Facing Nature: Levinas and Environmental Thought. Pennsylvania: Duquesne University Press, 2012. Ferwerda, Susanne M.A. Narrating the Anthropocene: Threading Contemporary Feminist Theory and Fiction in a Human-Dominated World. Diss. Utrecht University Repository, Faculty of Humanities Theses, 2016. Gibson, Graeme. “Margaret Atwood.” Eleven Canadian Novelists Interviewed by Graeme Gibson, Toronto: House of Anansi Press, 2014, pp. 1-30. Guenther, Lisa. The Gift of the Other, Levinas and the Politics of Reproduction. New York: State University of New York Press, 2006. Gross, Johanna. The Ongoing Creation of Humanity: Emmanuel Levinas and the Ethical Sense of “Unchosen People,” Diss. Georgetown University, Washington, D.C, 2012. Ingersoll, Earl, editor. Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Willowdale Ontario: Fire Fly, 1990. Kenaan, Hagi. The Ethics of Visuality: Levinas and the Contemporary Gaze, translated by Batya Stein. London: I. B. Tauris, 2013. Levinas, Emmanuel, and Philippe Nemo. Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo, translated by Richard A. Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1985. Levinas, Emmanuel. Alterity and Transcendence, translated by Michael B. Smith. London: The Athlone Press, 1999. ---. Entre-Nous: Thinking of-the Other, translated by Michael B. Smith & Barbara Harshav. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. ---. Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence, translated by Alphonso Lingis. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991. ---. Totality and Infinity, an Essay on Exteriority, translated by Alphonso Lingis. London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1979. Llewelyn, John. Emmanuel Levinas, the Genealogy of Ethics. London: Routledge, 1995. Marcus, Paul. Ancient Religious Wisdom, Spirituality, and Psychoanalysis. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003. Marques, Edwardo M. “Human after All? Neo-Transhumanism and the Post-Anthropocene Debate in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy.” Reveal, vol. 3, no. 17, 2017, pp. 178-190. Mead, Rebecca. “Margaret Atwood, the Prophet of Dystopia.” The New Yorker, 2017. From: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/17. Mohr, Dunja M., “Transgressive Utopian Dystopias: The Postmodern Reappearance of Utopia in the Disguise of Dystopia,” ZAA, vol. 55, no. 1, 2007, pp. 5-24. Muhic, Maja. “Dystopian Literature and the Contemporary Problems in Cultural Anthropology.” University Review of Univerzitetska misao, vol. 12, no. 3, 2013, pp. 71-78. From: www.ceeol.com. Muller, Klause Peter. “Reconstruction of Reality, Margaret Atwood’s Literature: A Constructionist Approach.” Margaret Atwood: Works and Impacts, edited by Reingard M. Nischich. Rochester: Camden House, 2000, pp. 229-258. Newton, Adam Zachary. Narrative Ethics. Harvard University Press: London, 1997. Pepitone, John Anthony. Kojeve and Levinas: Universality without Totality, Diss. Texas A & M University, Texas, 2010. Sheinfeld, Shayna. “Apocalyptic Literature,” End of Days: An Encyclopedia of the Apocalypse in World Religions, edited by Wendel G. Johnson (ABC-CLIO, LLC: California, 2017), pp. 30-35. Skibo-Birney, Bryn. “‘Bright Side’: Atwood’s Post-Apocalyptic Post-Anthropocentrism” Canadian Association for American Studies (CAAS): "Uncertain Futures". (Toronto 27-29 October 2017). pp. 1-9. ---. “Post-apocalyptic Storytelling and Post-anthropocentric Ethics in Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy.” Literature, Ethics, Morality: American Studies Perspectives – SANAS biannual conference, University of Basel, 21-22 November 2014. 1-7. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:101452 Waldenfels, Bernard. “Response and Responsibility in Levinas,” Ethics as First Philosophy: The Significance of Emmanuel Levinas for Philosophy, edited by Adriana T. Perperzak (London: Psychology Press, 1995), pp.39-55. Waltonen, Karma (Ed.) Margaret Atwood’s Apocalypses. London: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 526 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 234 |
||
