Exploring Pre-service Teachers’ Perspectives: The Impact of the ENGAGE Model in the EFL Classes

Esfandiari, Shahram; Heydari, Abdolhossein

doi:10.22034/jls.2024.141937.1144

فهرست نشریات

دومین نسخه چاپی مجله فصلنامه مطالعات ادبی و فرهنگی معاصر

آیین نامه نشریات علمی مصوب اردیبهشت ۱۳۹۸

شیوه نامه ارزیابی و رتبه بندی نشریات علمی

سامانه همیاب با امکان مشابهت یابی مقالات فعال شد

تقدیر و تشکر از چهار عنوان مجله برتر دانشگاه کردستان در هفته پژوهش

تعداد نشریات	31
تعداد شماره‌ها	400
تعداد مقالات	3,869
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	5,398,636
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	5,606,117

	Exploring Pre-service Teachers’ Perspectives: The Impact of the ENGAGE Model in the EFL Classes
پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناسی: نظریه و کاربرد
مقاله 2، دوره 4، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 11، مهر 1404، صفحه 25-41 اصل مقاله (439.91 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jls.2024.141937.1144
نویسندگان
Shahram Esfandiari^* ¹؛ Abdolhossein Heydari²
¹PhD in TEFL, Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
²Assistant Professor, Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
The current study attempted to investigate the perceptions of male and female pre-service English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers about using the ENGAGE model in the EFL classes. The participants of the study were 10 male and 10 female pre-service EFL teachers studying at Farhangian University in Ardabil, Iran. They were purposefully recruited based on their familiarity with the concept of the ENGAGE model and its application in their training classes. To collect data, an interview guide was utilized to obtain the perceptions of the participants on employing the ENGAGE model in the EFL classes. The data obtained revealed that not only could EFL learners promote their English but also, they could understand their surrounding world better. In addition, the participants stated that the knowledge or information the EFL students could receive throughout the ENGAGE model class was more than what they had received in ordinary classrooms. Also, the results have useful implications for EFL classes.
کلیدواژه‌ها
کلاس زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجه؛ مدل ENGAGE؛ دانشجو معلمان؛ دیدگاه

مراجع
^References ^{Abdollahzadeh, M., Barjesteh, H., & Biria, R. (2021). The impact of teaching through ENGAGE Model on L2 speaking of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Horizons, 5(2), 205–214.}^{https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2021.33502.1381} ^{Abdollahzadeh, M., Barjesteh, H., & Biria, R. (2023). A study on the efficacy of the ENGAGE model in improving speaking components of EFL learners: A comparative methodological approach. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 6(3), 2581–2604.}^{https://doi.org/10.22034/IJCE.2023.361770.1436} ^{Bell, D., & Kahrhoff, J. (2006). Active learning handbook. Institute for Excellence.} ^{Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2019). Language learner autonomy in a tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 23, 38–9.} ^{https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817725759} ^{Bowman, S. R., Angeli, G., Potts, C., & Manning, C. D. (2015). A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference. Learning and Development, 25, 10–21.} ^{Breen, M. P. (1987). Contemporary paradigms in syllabus design Part II. Language Teaching, 20(3), 157–174.} ^{Cacioppo, J. T., & Freberg, L. (2018). Discovering psychology: The science of mind. Cengage Learning.} ^{Caine, G. (2018). Making connections between e-learning and natural learning. In C.J. Fitzgerald, S. Laurian-Fitzgerald & C. Popa (Eds.). Handbook of research on student- centered strategies in online adult learning environments (pp. 1–15). IGI Global.} ^{Cambourne, B. (1988). The whole story: Natural learning and the acquisition of literacy in the classroom. Scholastic, Inc.} ^{Clarke, D. F. (1991). The negotiated syllabus: what is it and how is it likely to work? Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 13–28.} ^{Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.} ^{Csizér, K. (2017). Motivation in the L2 classroom. In S. Loewen& M. Sato (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 418–432). Routledge.} ^{Esfandiari, S., Mahmoudi, A., & Davaribina, M. (2020). The ENGAGE model is an innovation in The EFL classroom. Journal of Language Horizons, 4(2),261–286.} ^{https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2020.31168.1298} ^{Esfandiari, S., Mahmoudi, A., & Davaribina, M. (2021). The ENGAGE model is an innovation in Teaching speaking: A case of cognitively more and less active EFL learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 13(4),729–753.} ^{https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.13.4.8} ^{Gholami, J., Mohaddeseh, S. A., & Saedi, M. (2024). A Comparative Study of the Effects of the TBLT Method and ENGAGE Model on Iranian EFL Learners' CAF in Writing Performance. Research in English Language Pedagogy (RELP), 12(2), 42–429.}^{https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2023.1997468.1504} ^{Halsey, V.W. (2011). Brilliance by design. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. Halsey, V. W., & Halsey, R. W. (2017). Connecting Californians with the Chaparral through the ENGAGE model.}^{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68303-4_11} ^{Halsey, R. W., Halsey, V. W., & Gaudette, R. (2018). Connecting Californians with the chaparral. In E. C. Underwood, H. D. Safford, N. A. Molinari & J. E. Keeley (Eds.), Valuing chaparral (pp. 295–322). Springer.} ^{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68303-4_11} ^{Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2024). Engagement in language learning: A Systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 201-230.} ^{https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289} ^{Hodge, D. C., Baxter Magolda, M. B., & Haynes, C. A. (2009). Engaged learning: Enabling self-authorship and effective practice. Liberal Education, 95(4), 16–23.} ^{Jupp, V. (Ed.). (2006). The Sage dictionary of social research. Sage.} ^{Kilbourne, C. (2011). Connect, inspire, and ENGAGE: A model for improving safety training. Retrieved March 29, 2024, from} ^{https://ehsdailyadvisor.blr.com/2011/09/connect-inspire} ^{Kim, S. C., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A. M., Stichler, J. F., & Davidson, J. E. (2017). Benefits of a regional evidence‐based practice fellowship program: A test of the ARCC Model. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 14(2), 90–98.} ^{Kojuri, J., Takmil, F., Amini, M., & Nabeiei, P. (2015). The use of Q2 engage model (EQ2) for Educational scholarship at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS). Medical teacher, 37(9), 885–886,} ^{https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.1001348} ^{Lucas, T., Viillegas, M.A., & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive Teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education 59(4),361–373.} ^{https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322110} ^{Ockey, G. J., Koyama, D., Setoguchi, E., & Sun, A. (2015). The extent to which TOEFL iBT speaking scores are associated with performance on oral language tasks and oral ability components for Japanese university students. Language Testing, 32(1), 39–62.} ^{Richards, J.C., & Schmidt, R. (1985). Dictionary of language teaching and applied Linguistics. Pearson Education.} ^{Rundel, P. W. (2018). California chaparral and its global significance. In E. C. Underwood, H.} ^{Safford, N. A. Molinari & J.E. Keeley (Eds.), Valuing chaparral (pp. 1–27). Springer.} ^{Safari, P., & Rashidi, N. (2015). Teacher education beyond transmission: Challenges and} ^{Opportunities for Iranian teachers of English. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 187–198.} ^{Salimpoor Aghdam, M., Gholami, J., & Saeidi, M. (2024). The impact of the ENGAGE model and TBLT application on the overall writing ability of Iranian EFL learners. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 40, 113–128.}^{https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.40.07} ^{Smith, R., & Rebolledo, p. (2018). A handbook for exploratory action research. British Council.} ^{Underwood, E. C., Safford, H. D., Molinari, N. A., & Keeley, J.E. (2018). Valuing chaparral.} ^Springer. ^{Ushioda, E., & Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Beyond global English: Motivation to learn languages in a Multicultural world: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 451–454.}^{https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12407} ^{Waddington, J. (2017, October). Competency-Based ELT: Learning to learn through our storytelling circle. In M. Baker (Ed.), Proceedings of APAC-ELT Conference (pp. 16– 28). McMillan.}^{http://hdl.handle.net/10256/18422} ^{Willison, J. (2020). The models of engaged learning and teaching. Springer Briefs in Education.} ^{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2683-1} ^{Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with the teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102.} ^{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004} ^{Zhang, X., Meng, Y., Ordóñez de Pablos, P., & Sun, Y. (2019). Learning analytics in collaborative learning supported by Slack: From the perspective of engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 625–633.} ^{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.012}
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 454 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 65

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

پیوندهای مفید

اخبار و اعلانات

آمار

Exploring Pre-service Teachers’ Perspectives: The Impact of the ENGAGE Model in the EFL Classes