| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 400 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,869 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,398,643 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,606,125 |
Cultivating Opportunities: The Role of Guided Mobile-Assisted Task Performance on Reactivity to Mistake and L2 Willingness to Communicate | ||
| پژوهشهای زبانشناسی: نظریه و کاربرد | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 4، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 11، مهر 1404، صفحه 43-66 اصل مقاله (440.58 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jls.2025.142706.1194 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Elham Mehrara1؛ Parviz Ajideh* 2؛ Mohammad Zohrabi2؛ Masoud Yaghubi Notash3؛ Yaser Hadidi2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student, Department of English Language Faculty of Persian Literature & Foreign Languages University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor,, Department of English Language, Faculty of Persian Literature; Foreign Language, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 3Department of English Language, Faculty of Persian Literature & Foreign Languages, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The use of technology has become an important part of the learning nowadays. There is paucity of studies on Mobile-Assisted learning and its two modes (guided and unguided) on willingness to communicate and reactivity to mistake of EFL learners. For this purpose, 54 Iranian EFL learners with the age range of 21 to 27 at the intermediate level took part in this study. The data gathering tools were Oxford Placement Test (OPT), willingness to communicate (WTC) questionnaire, reactivity to mistake scale, and a semi-structured interview. The students were randomly assigned to one control group and two experimental groups of guided and unguided mobile-assisted task performance. The results showed that using mobile learning in general was effective in English classrooms; however, the role of guided mobile-assisted task performance was highlighted in increasing the level of WTC and a change in the level of reactivity to mistake. The quantitative results represented more positive attitudes towards the strategy. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| mobile-assisted task performance؛ reactivity to mistake؛ technology؛ willingness to communicate | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References
Alotaibi, H. H., & Zeidan, A. A. (2023). Mobile Learning Implementation In EFL/ESL: Qualitative Systematic Review. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(3), 896-920.
Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language learning, 50(2), 311-341.
Bashori, M., van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2020). Web-based language learning and speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5-6), 1058-1089.
Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2023). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: a systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1373-1425. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group, and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480-493.
Cahyono, B. Y., Khotimah, K., & Batunan, D. A., Imamyartha, D. (2023). Workable Approaches in EFL Teaching Mediated by Mobile Technology during the Pandemic and Post-Pandemic: Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Experiences and Expectations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 138-159.
Chen, Y. C. (2024). Effects of technology-enhanced language learning on reducing EFL learners’ public speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 789-813.
Chen, Y. C., Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2024). Motivating students to become self-regulatory learners: A gamified mobile self-regulated learning approach. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 15533-15556. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-12462-z
Chen, M. Y., & Lin, Y. M. (2023). Mobile-assisted language assessment for adult EFL learners: Recommendations from a systematic review. Innovation in learning-oriented language assessment, First online, March 2023, 237-256. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-18950-0_14
Dewaele, J. M. (2007). The effect of multilingualism, sociobiographical, and situational factors on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety of mature language learners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 391-409.
Eason, G., Noble, B., & Sneddon, I. N. (1955). On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 247(935), 529-551.
Ebadijalal, M., & Yousofi, N. (2023). The impact of mobile-assisted peer feedback on EFL learners’ speaking performance and anxiety: does language make a difference?. The Language Learning Journal, 51(1), 112-130. DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2021.1957990
Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2024). Improving EFL learners’ speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated interactions. System, 121, 103254.
Gholami, J., & Aliyari, S. (2015). The impact of planned preemptive focus on form on Iranian EFL learners’ essay writing ability. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 10(3), 234-245. Doi: 10.1080/22040552.2015.1135500
Gregersen, T., & Horwitz, E. K. (2002). Language learning and perfectionism: Anxious and non‐anxious language learners' reactions to their own oral performance. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 562-570. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1192725
Gooch, D., Thompson, P., Nash, H. M., Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2016). The development of executive function and language skills in the early school years. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(2), 180-187. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12458
Hashim, S., Omar, M. K., Ab Jalil, H., & Sharef, N. M. (2022). Trends on technologies and artificial intelligence in education for personalized learning: systematic literature review. Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(1), 884-903.
Hashim, H., Yunus, M. M., Embi, M. A., & Ozir, N. A. M. (2017). Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) for ESL learners: A review of affordances and constraints. Sains Humanika, 9, 1-5.
Horwitz, E. K. (2000). It Ain't Over'til It's Over: On Foreign Language Anxiety, First Language Deficits, and the Confounding of Variables. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2). 256-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00067
Huang, L., Liu, S., & Zhang, S. (2016). Effects of situated mobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 248-259.
Huang, C., Wang, T., & Li, Y. (2024). Mobile-assisted English learning beyond the classroom: Understanding the effects of language proficiency on Chinese undergraduate students’ behavioral engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 737-762.
Hsu, H. T., & Lin, C. C. (2022). Factors Influencing University Students’ Intention to Engage in Mobile-assisted Language Learning through the Lens of Action Control Theory. Educational Technology & Society, 25(4), 29-42.
Hwang, G. J., Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2024). Enhancing EFL learners’ speaking skills, foreign language enjoyment, and language-specific grit utilizing the affordances of a MALL app: A microgenetic perspective. Computers & Education, 214(4), 105015.
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105015
Keane, T., Keane, W. F., & Blicblau, A. S. (2016). Beyond traditional literacy: Learning and transformative practices using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 769-781.
Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205-218.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2015). Language as a bridge connecting formal and informal language learning through mobile devices. In Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 281-294). Springer, Singapore.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile-assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289.
Kukulska‐Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207-218.
Lee, J. S. (2019). EFL students’ views of willingness to communicate in the extramural digital context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 692-712.
Lee, J. S., & Liu, L. (2022). Dynamicity of EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in an online class. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1-19.
Li, Q., & Chan, K. K. (2024). Test takers’ attitudes toward using exam-oriented mobile applications as a tool to adapt to a high-stakes speaking test. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 219-237.
Luan, L., Yi, Y., Hwang, G. J., Dong, Y., Jing, B., & Liu, J. (2024). Facilitating EFL learners’ willingness to communicate amidst the pandemic: a digital storytelling-based online flipped learning approach. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 139-154.
Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language learning, 59(2), 453-498.
Maxwell, J. C. (1873). A treatise on electricity and magnetism. Clarendon Press Google Scholar, 2, 3408-3425.
Miller, A., & Cuevas, H. (2017). Mobile learning and its effects on academic achievement and student motivation in middle grades students. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 9(2), 39-56.
Moen, K. M., & McAllister, D. (2019). The effects of feedback and error correction on students' perceptions of language learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2196.
Mohammadi, E., & Masoumi, A. (2021). The Relationship between Learning Vocabulary via Mobile (Mobile-Assisted Language Learning) and Iranian EFL Learners’ Social Anxiety and Loneliness. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 13(4), 775-800.
Nugent, S. A. (2000). Perfectionism: Its manifestations and classroom-based interventions. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(4), 215-221.
Nugroho, A. (2021). Learners' Willingness to Communicate in a Foreign Language: The Role of Informal Digital Learning of English. ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews, 1(2), 125-133.
Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2024). Employing the e-tandem language learning method to enhance speaking skills and willingness to communicate: the case of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 924-960.
Rassaei, E. (2015). Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety, and L2 development. System, 49, 98-109.
Sadeghi, F., Sadighi, F., & Bagheri, M. S. (2020). The relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ language mindset, goal orientation, and responses to failure. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1833814.
Santosa, M. H. (2017). Learning approaches of Indonesian EFL Gen Z students in a flipped learning context. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 7(2), 183-208.
Soyoof, A. (2023). Iranian EFL students’ perception of willingness to communicate in an extramural digital context. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5922-5939.
Stairs, A. M. (2009). Examining the construct of perfectionism: A factor-analytic study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(2), 67-75.
Stöber, J. (1998). Worry, problem elaboration, and suppression of imagery: The role of concreteness. Behavior Research and Therapy, 36(7-8), 751-756.
Stockwell, G. (2021). Living and Learning with Technology: Language Learning with Mobile Devices. English Teaching, 76, 3-16.
Tai, T. Y. (2024). Comparing the effects of intelligent personal assistant-human and human-human interactions on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate beyond the classroom. Computers & Education, 210, 104965.
Tai, T. Y., & Chen, H. H. J. (2023). The impact of Google Assistant on adolescent EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1485-1502.
Thompson, D. S. (2019). Teaching students to critically read digital images: A visual literacy approach using the DIG method. Journal of Visual Literacy, 38(1-2). 110-119.
Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour, engagement, and achievement in a flipped classroom supported by a learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79-91.
Wang, X., Chen, J., & Zhang, T. (2021). Facilitating English grammar learning by a personalized mobile-assisted system with a self-regulated learning mechanism. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 624430.
Wu, W. C., & Perng, Y. H. (2016). Research on the correlations among mobile learning perception, study habits, and continuous learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), 1665-1673.
Zain, D. S. M., & Bowles, F. A. (2024). What Do Our Future EFL Teachers Think about Using Mobile Devices in Class? Applied Research on English Education, 2(1), 1-14.
Zhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Ketwan, P. (2021). EFL students' preferences for written corrective feedback: Do error types, language proficiency, and foreign language enjoyment matter?. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 660-564.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 174 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 40 |
||